Origin of Life: new commentaries (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, February 06, 2011, 01:37 (5039 days ago) @ David Turell

After 60 years of research we are no further along than knowing what does not work. How to go from inorganic chemistry to organic (living) chemistry is as big a puzzle as ever.
> 
> Discussion of pre-biotic soup in which available molecules, that are luckily organic, somehow or other fall together:
> 
> http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2011/01/more-prebiotic-soup-nonsense.html
&#10... 
> Next is the upstart metabolic pathway, just as problematic, which requires a citric acid cycle and uses co-enzyme A, a giant organic molecule. Did Co-A just happen to be lying around by chance or glorious accident. It is a just-so story of Darwinist biochemists:
> 
> Metabolilc pathway:
> 
> http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2009/05/metabolism-first-and-origin-of-life.html
&... 
> And look at the size of Co-A:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coenzyme_A-Sandwalk. Have we a new Shapiro?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"