Origin of Life: new commentaries (Introduction)

by romansh , Saturday, February 05, 2011, 21:05 (5019 days ago) @ David Turell

That is the sort of universe we live in. Multiverses, no proof!? So there can be a first cause.
I make no claim other than the evidence points away from a Euclidean universe.
eg relativistic behaviours of planets etc and quantum phenomena we observe at the very small.-This of course says nothing about first causes or their absence.
 
> I don't want to stop at the point I have reached. I think there is a UI by logic, but I have no real absolute proof now. Can I find some proof? Currently not now, but I can accept proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and keep studying and thinking. Personally I am content with that position.-There of course is no proof in science - only evidence that is coherent with the theory or hypothesis - or not. Then either we discard or modify the said theory. Proof is for law courts, mathematicians with sound axioms and alcohol.-You may well think there is a universal intelligence. But for me your logic seems to be I disagree with the mainstream view, I think things are too complex to arise spontaneously, therefore there must be a UI. Is this an accurate summation of your position David?