Let robots be \"babies\" first... (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Saturday, January 29, 2011, 15:12 (5046 days ago) @ David Turell


> > Really in the end I'm just pointing out that there's a good reason for our differences--partly due to training--and that I don't see this as a wall as much as an opportunity to gain a different perspective.
> 
> Fair enough. In medicine we are taught to have a list of 'differential diagoses', with the 'best' one first. But it is all based on the mental odds for it being true. We were also taught to write a 'present illness' illustrating the most probably diagnosis first. So you are right, I play the odds. And you are on the straight and narrow.-The biggest thing I can offer--if I could reduce my field to one thing, it's deciding whether or not a problem is solvable by the process of making the ambiguous problem unambiguous. -(dhw, not forgetting about you, I just have schoolwork to tackle this weekend.)

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"