Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism (Humans)
> > My take is that math is language only. And we use it to describe nature. Personally I think that a God would be more likely if we couldn't describe our world with it. > > Why can't God have language of any sort. He gave us the ability to invent math and to learn language quickly.-Language's purpose is purely for communication. What need would a supreme being have for communication as crude as math, instead of communicating by direct experience?
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Complete thread:
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-20, 22:02
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 15:46
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 16:05
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 17:56
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 23:49
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-22, 00:48
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-25, 11:47
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism - David Turell, 2011-01-25, 15:32
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-25, 11:47
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-22, 00:48
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 23:49
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 17:56
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 16:05
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism - David Turell, 2021-09-25, 15:29
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 15:46