Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism (Humans)
Maths that describe forms not yet in our reality indicate possible potentials or conjectures of future reality recognitions: Calabi-Yau space, Kaluza-Klein theory. > > You support String Theory? I could have sworn you were a critic...? If we can't verify Calabi-Yau or Kaluza-Klein, they are meaningless theories.-I said 'possible...conjectures'. I used those as an example.I think string theory is dead as the dodo. Dhw take note.-> My take is that math is language only. And we use it to describe nature. Personally I think that a God would be more likely if we couldn't describe our world with it.-Why can't God have language of any sort. He gave us the ability to invent math and to learn language quickly.
Complete thread:
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-20, 22:02
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 15:46
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 16:05
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 17:56
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 23:49
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-22, 00:48
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-25, 11:47
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism - David Turell, 2011-01-25, 15:32
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-25, 11:47
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-22, 00:48
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 23:49
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 17:56
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
xeno6696,
2011-01-21, 16:05
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism - David Turell, 2021-09-25, 15:29
- Language, Mathematics, and Reductionism -
David Turell,
2011-01-21, 15:46