inference of a multiverse more plausible now: dark flow (The limitations of science)

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Friday, January 07, 2011, 07:42 (4855 days ago) @ xeno6696


> In the case of christianity, we have no evidence that resurrection is possible. But it turns out that that the entire religion turns upon that single claim being true. It defies reason and experience. It is in THIS kind of claim that a scientist can ask, "What is you evidence for this claim?"
> 
> But note the semantical difference between 'evidence' and 'proof' and you should understand the nuance of my thinking more clearly...-
Modern medical science brings people back from the dead every day. So, I think we can certainly say that resurrection is a likely scenario, without delving into the realm of mysticism. What the finite limits are on that, though, we really do not know at this point. -As for the other, it seems that the classification of evidence is often in the eye of the beholder. What one scientist sees as evidence for the big bang, another sees as evidence for the plasma universe model, what one sees as evidence for creation, another sees as evidence for evolution.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum