inference of a multiverse more plausible now: dark flow (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Sunday, January 02, 2011, 17:41 (5072 days ago) @ David Turell

This weirdness is part of my... intense foundation of skepticism. Man thinks he knows much, but we know only the merest fraction of our universe. This is one reason I found atheism reasonable but premature--even though I clearly admit that for all intents and purposes I'm an atheist myself. -My distinction with atheists and theists is that it is unreasonable to do as Dawkins does and as you do, to take that non-evidential leap of inference.-In one respect your views are similar; as you can't fathom how we came to be without a creator, Dawkins can't fathom a creator.-Do you have the title for Penrose's book? I didn't see it on amazon.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum