Pow! Zap! (Big) Bang?! (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Saturday, September 25, 2010, 21:57 (5172 days ago) @ David Turell

So if C, spherical expansion is not true, then either A(BBT), or (B)Laws of Motion, must be false. The reason being is that in a vacuum, even a near vacuum, the bang would have to be spherical, because there would be no gravity at T=0 to shape it any other way. It is only AFTER the bang, that there could possibly be any gravity that would have an affect, and at that point, it is too late. -The matter on the front wave would always have to be spherical, unless-A)There were something outside the leading boundary of the universe that would impede motion(which we have no way of testing, and btw, our model of quantum physics can not be verified to exist outside of our universe, so no assuming there is matter of any sort outside our universe)-or-B)There was no singularity, which would mean that in essence, there was no bang-The primary reason for that is that gravity, as I have said before is a weak force. The outer most matter would be too sparsely separated to be affected by gravity. The only other force available at that instant that could make it 'lumpy' is EM from plasma, which would be much more likely as it is considered a strong force. That would mean however at T=1, there would have to be plasma and that plasma would have to have generated a strong enough EM field to affect light particles a minimum of 299792.458km away. (Speed of light over one second). This creates another flaw though. IF the EM field was strong enough to slow down particles at T=1, the universe would not have expanded, it would have collapsed in on itself within seconds because as the plasma mass grew the em field would only get stronger. -"If the fireball had expanded only .1 percent faster, the present
rate of expansion would have been 3 x 103 times as great. Had the
initial expansion rate been 0.1 percent less, the Universe would
have expanded to only 3 x 10-6 of its present radius before collapsing.
At this maximum radius the density of ordinary matter would
have been 10-12 grm/m3, over 1016 times as great as the present massdensity. No stars could have formed in such a Universe, for it would
not have existed long enough to form stars."—*R.H. Dickey, Gravitation
and the Universe (1969), p. 62.-Yes, I know its plasma not a fireball, but the numbers still work.-However, you should read these two articles.-
If you are going to snatch plasma for the Big Bang, you might as well follow through with plasma as it still makes more sense with the available data.(including almost everything the BBT uses to support itself.) This is fun! :)