New model of Peer Review (The limitations of science)
> > > This is EXACTLY what science needs... a centralized server (wikipedia) that allows debate and evolving views. > > > > I agree with you but arXiv is delivered for credentialed folks and is a centralized resource. I used it in my book. A series of arXiv's with discussion forum areas for each aspect of science would do the same thing. One Wikipedia for prepublication papers would be ponderous. > > I'm confused... wasn't part of your issue with the current system that "credentialed" people are blocking access via PR?-arXiv is open to anyone with the proper credentials in physical science to present pre-publication work. To my knowledge 'open' means open to submit. No PR. I guess my comment above was confusing.
Complete thread:
- New model of Peer Review -
xeno6696,
2010-08-14, 15:03
- New model of Peer Review -
David Turell,
2010-08-14, 17:18
- New model of Peer Review -
xeno6696,
2010-08-16, 01:03
- New model of Peer Review -
David Turell,
2010-08-16, 02:34
- New model of Peer Review -
xeno6696,
2010-08-17, 01:43
- New model of Peer Review - David Turell, 2010-08-17, 14:48
- New model of Peer Review -
xeno6696,
2010-08-17, 01:43
- New model of Peer Review -
David Turell,
2010-08-16, 02:34
- New model of Peer Review -
xeno6696,
2010-08-16, 01:03
- New model of Peer Review - George Jelliss, 2010-08-28, 00:21
- New model of Peer Review -
David Turell,
2010-08-14, 17:18