New model of Peer Review (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 01:43 (5211 days ago) @ David Turell


> > This is EXACTLY what science needs... a centralized server (wikipedia) that allows debate and evolving views.
> 
> I agree with you but arXiv is delivered for credentialed folks and is a centralized resource. I used it in my book. A series of arXiv's with discussion forum areas for each aspect of science would do the same thing. One Wikipedia for prepublication papers would be ponderous.-I'm confused... wasn't part of your issue with the current system that "credentialed" people are blocking access via PR?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"