E. Coli vs. Linux (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 04:09 (5301 days ago) @ BBella

What I'm attempting here... is to cast doubt on the idea that life *had* to have been designed. Our economy wasn't designed: in fact, direct design tends to destroy it. (This goes for both governments, uncouth businessmen, and cartels.) Generally: a nation prospers the more it allows individual actors free reign to use its resources. 
> 
> This last sentence above ties in and reminds me of the duality within the one fabric of what is. All parts of the One fabric freely using all aspects of the fabric as a resource while working independently toward one goal - to be. And I can see what Matt is saying above and below - "direct design tends to destroy it" when one aspect of the fabric wants to rule other parts of the fabric it goes down hill from there. In a sense this is a good argument against design. 
> -What if, the best design is no design at all?-> > 
> > Think of why Communism failed as a government: You can't dictate supply and demand. This too means that since life so readily responds to economic principles, that we should consider the consequences if there's direct interference, and what patterns those would reflect on life itself.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"