The Nature of this Conflict (Humans)

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Sunday, January 17, 2010, 21:51 (5423 days ago) @ xeno6696

xeno wrote: I think he got further confused when I argued that zero evidence of God doesn't allow us to say in the definitive "God does not exist." Safer is the claim, "God probably doesn't exist," or my preferred, "I have no reason to believe in God."-What's wrong with this argument is that you are assuming that you know what is meant by "God". People have all sorts of ideas about different kinds of "God". Most of them are easily shown to be nonexistent by science, or even by simple logic.-Of course if you are prepared to water down your concept of "God" until it is so vague or so ineffectual as to bear little resemblance to any "God" that has ever had any popular acclaim, you are on safe ground in being agnostic.

--
GPJ


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum