Reasons why ID must be considered (Introduction)

by dhw, Tuesday, June 27, 2017, 15:09 (2704 days ago) @ David Turell

DAVID: An essay by a thinking prof who does not accept ID but says it must not be rejected:
https://www.academia.edu/33313918/Intelligent_Design_Maybe_True_Maybe_False_But_Not_Absurd

QUOTE: "I do not claim to have a settled answer for myself. I just don't know. Intelligent design may or may not be the case -- I believe we will not, indeed cannot, ever know for sure -- but it is hard for me to dismiss as merely foolish Einstein's conjecture that there may exist "an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.'"

DAVID’s comment: My point of view. The whole essay is excellent.

It’s actually my point of view not yours, since he remains undecided. Thank you for what I agree is an excellent essay.

Thank you also for the intriguing essay on panpsychism, which I hope to come back to. Out of time now!