ID as a Cultural Phenomenon (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Saturday, October 03, 2009, 20:44 (5321 days ago) @ David Turell

http://www.softpedia.com/progScreenshots/Natural-Arches-Screenshot-103364.html
... > 
> > Have to be designed? This raises a good question. The statistics behind such an arch forming are staggering. Yet it too, happens by chance.
> 
> Arches national monument happned because the properties of the unlying granite stone has the properies to allow arches by erosion.-But if we ask the question "What are the odds that it appeared," and the continue to drill down the questions to "What are the odds that those atoms appeared in those places," don't we continue to make the event more and more unlikely? -I only ask because most of the ID "statistical" arguments I've seen appear to be made by continuously drilling the scope down. (Was rereading some sections of "Black Box.")

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"