Jerry Coyne is criticized with good reason (Introduction)

by romansh , Wednesday, August 12, 2015, 23:59 (3392 days ago) @ David Turell

Daivd: I still think Gould's NOMA is reasonable.
> > 
> > Rom: Fair enough. But what were Jerry's reasons for disagreeing with this position?
> 
> Simply, the gulf between the two approaches is too wide. They have nothing to offer each other. He points to the Bible stories, which I don't use, and points out they are counter to science. I do understand that parts of the OT are true history born out by archeological explorations. I've stood in excavation of the City of David outside the walls of the old city of Jerusalem.-Are these Jerry's reasons "the gulf is too wide". "They have nothing to offer each other"? You really should read the book.-I have stood on the Banks of the River Jordan? The Eucalyptus trees I thought were interesting.