Jerry Coyne is criticized with good reason (Introduction)

by David Turell , Wednesday, August 12, 2015, 23:44 (3392 days ago) @ romansh

Daivd: I still think Gould's NOMA is reasonable.
> 
> Rom: Fair enough. But what were Jerry's reasons for disagreeing with this position?-Simply, the gulf between the two approaches is too wide. They have nothing to offer each other. He points to the Bible stories, which I don't use, and points out they are counter to science. I do understand that parts of the OT are true history born out by archeological explorations. I've stood in excavation of the City of David outside the walls of the old city of Jerusalem.