Quantum science (Introduction)
I came across this link to an article by Victor J Stenger on Quantum Quackery. I'm not sure if I've posted it here before, but it is relevant to a lot of the recent comments. > > http://www.csicop.org/si/9701/quantum-quackery.html > > At the end it offers an explanation of entanglement in terms of quantum fluctuation of the vacuum. - I appreciate seeing this article by Stenger. Nowhere have I read an explanation like this. Does any other scientific group support it? All the stuff I've seen accept the fact that there is entanglement and 'spooky action at a distance'. > > In fact I do it myself. Problems only arise when people state these beliefs as totally established facts that we must all bow down to. - I feel just as you do, and am willing to change a view as evidence changes.
Complete thread:
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-07-14, 02:01
- Quantum science - xeno6696, 2009-07-14, 20:07
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-08-08, 14:31
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-08-08, 19:17
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-08-09, 14:49
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-09, 18:22
- Quantum science -
xeno6696,
2009-09-10, 22:56
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-13, 11:14
- Quantum science - David Turell, 2009-09-14, 02:09
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2011-01-25, 01:25
- Quantum science: new maths needed - David Turell, 2017-03-31, 19:05
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-13, 11:14
- Quantum science -
xeno6696,
2009-09-10, 22:56
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-09, 18:22
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-08-09, 14:49
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-08-08, 19:17