Quantum science (Introduction)
I didn't find anything new there, but I don't have a subscription so can't read the links. - Thinking mathematically I would point out that Nothing is just a special case of Something, where the amount of the Something is zero. As a "Nihilist" I'm now inclined to believe that there is in fact Nothing, if you add it all up (both the positive and the negative). - Looking at some of my old essays I came across this link to an article by Victor J Stenger on Quantum Quackery. I'm not sure if I've posted it here before, but it is relevant to a lot of the recent comments. - http://www.csicop.org/si/9701/quantum-quackery.html - At the end it offers an explanation of entanglement in terms of quantum fluctuation of the vacuum. - As to people believing what they want to believe for aesthetic or emotional reasons, or, as one of the sections of the New Scientist article suggests, because it makes a good story, I've nothing against this. In fact I do it myself. Problems only arise when people state these beliefs as totally established facts that we must all bow down to.
--
GPJ
Complete thread:
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-07-14, 02:01
- Quantum science - xeno6696, 2009-07-14, 20:07
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-08-08, 14:31
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-08-08, 19:17
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-08-09, 14:49
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-09, 18:22
- Quantum science -
xeno6696,
2009-09-10, 22:56
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-13, 11:14
- Quantum science - David Turell, 2009-09-14, 02:09
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2011-01-25, 01:25
- Quantum science: new maths needed - David Turell, 2017-03-31, 19:05
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-13, 11:14
- Quantum science -
xeno6696,
2009-09-10, 22:56
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-09, 18:22
- Quantum science -
David Turell,
2009-08-09, 14:49
- Quantum science -
George Jelliss,
2009-08-08, 19:17