Why is a \"designer\" so compelling? (The nature of a \'Creator\')

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 04:29 (5609 days ago) @ David Turell

I must insert a correction in my previous post:
> 
> > Then I took on Darwin and evolution; Darwin starts AFTER life is present. His theory does NOT account for life itself, and there is still no evidence for macroevolution, only microevolution. And yes, no question, evolution occurred. As I have stated before, we are still uncovering the full mechanism. Natural selection IS passive. The competition IS active, but the opponents of the battle for survival arrive by chance, from a purposeless progression if one is to believe today's Darwin proponents. The driving force BY providing the players in the game of evolution RESULTS IN A passive PROCESS. 
> 
> I need to edit better. - It's alright. I find nothing wrong with what you say here, except that you do realize that in order to capture macroevolution you would have to capture one of every generation--as a calculus example every infinitesimal under the curve? What would suffice as evidence barring this?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"