Why ID nor Darwinism works (Introduction)

by romansh , Monday, June 09, 2014, 00:37 (3821 days ago) @ David Turell

We interpret differently. The area you critique involves his discussion and dismissal of ID primarily. He then questions consciousness and how it works, and you have expressed issues over free will. Finally he dismisses Darwin asnd comes across like Nagel.-Nowhere does the author dismiss ID. He does dismiss the ability of ID to explain stuff. Well sorry David, the the fairies under my garden shed also don't explain much either. -He then goes onto say evolution has no explanatory capability
>>But then neither can Darwinism explain how things come to be for instead of an intelligent designer (which intuitively makes sense) it offers random mistakes filtered by natural selection which is just another layer of randomness (which makes no sense at all). The details of why random mistakes would show up in a useful progression such that tremendously complicated structures get built up are never provided, nor explained, nor quantified in any way that science demands. 
Intuitively makes sense ... balderdash!->> Nor is it at all clear how each mistake could provide instant benefits even though a fully functional transformation remains in the distant future.
This person has no clue ... and you think it is evenhanded?