Why ID nor Darwinism works (Introduction)

by David Turell , Monday, June 09, 2014, 00:17 (3821 days ago) @ romansh

First off, I maintain there can be no science telling us how an intelligent designer creates. That process is not only mysterious when applied to a supernatural agent; it is mysterious when applied to us.
> Rom: That's evenhanded right?
> 
> > Can writers trace the source of every word that pops into mind as they write? Can chemists fully explain why they choose one approach to analysis over another? Can engineers completely justify all materials choices? Can photographers explain precisely why they chose to frame an instant in time as they did?
> ROM: Strawman.
> 
> > Nor can any "science" be derived from such ambiguous, incompletion.
> A bold unsubstantiated assertion.
> 
> Rom:And this is just the first paragraph.-We interpret differently. The area you critique involves his discussion and dismissal of ID primarily. He then questions consciousness and how it works, and you have expressed issues over free will. Finally he dismisses Darwin asnd comes across like Nagel.