Time\'s Arrow (General)

by romansh ⌂ @, Friday, May 09, 2014, 23:09 (3632 days ago) @ David Turell


> > Romansh: Our other most corroborated theory ... quantum mechanics, is fundamentally not compatible with relativity.
> > 
> > I look forward to seeing which if not both these two theories gets disproven with time.
> 
> 
> I think you missed our discussions with Ruth Kastner. It seems that quantum phenomena may exist at another level of reality than the one we live in and recognize. As a result she proposes transactional analysis of the passage of quanta into our realm. It explains the spooky action at a distance in our level while in the other level they are closely related and connected. No speed of light problem. I suggest you look back at the discussions. Two levels, two theories, and they may never mix. And both seem to work really well within their areas. Disproven, probably not. Melded into one GUT, doubt it.-What is proposed is far from proof.-Also as objects (matter) travel faster the clocks slow relative to some stationary observer is well demonstrated. As is the fact the object gains mass. -In fact at the speed of light not only does time appear to stop, the object gains infinite mass. So are you suggesting that objects travelling at the speed of light have been proven to have infinite mass?-Both these aspects of relativity are due to the Lorentz transformation going to zero and the mathematical applicability becoming suspect.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum