Science; What we don\'t know (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Monday, March 24, 2014, 04:26 (3898 days ago) @ George Jelliss

The first commenter states:
> 
> >Can "nothing" be unstable? Not by any scientific logic.
> 
> >Absolute "nothingness" would be absolutely stable. To any sane natural philosopher it is a fairly ridiculous concept.
> 
> I completely disagree with this!
> How accurately can nothing be measured? 
> To be an absolute nothing it has to be 0.00000000000... 
> where there are an infinity of zeros. 
> If there was a nonzero digit somewhere along the line 
> it would not be nothing but something.
> Something, however small, is something. 
> Nothing, to exist, has to be impossibly accurately defined.-Lawrence Krauss wrote a book in 2012, entitled "Something from Nothing."-In his view, you're wrong: Nothing never ceased to exist in the first place! -Love it when you post here!!!

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"