Science; What we don\'t know (Introduction)

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Friday, March 14, 2014, 10:50 (3907 days ago) @ David Turell

The first commenter states:->Can "nothing" be unstable? Not by any scientific logic.->Absolute "nothingness" would be absolutely stable. To any sane natural philosopher it is a fairly ridiculous concept.-I completely disagree with this!
How accurately can nothing be measured? 
To be an absolute nothing it has to be 0.00000000000... 
where there are an infinity of zeros. 
If there was a nonzero digit somewhere along the line 
it would not be nothing but something.
Something, however small, is something. 
Nothing, to exist, has to be impossibly accurately defined.

--
GPJ


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum