Matt: Dangerous AI? (Introduction)
Matt: I'll poke you again: > > "Traditional CMOS chips were not invented with parallelism in mind, so it shouldn't come as a big surprise that they have trouble mimicking mammalian brains, the best parallel machines on Earth." > > You're not thinking about the problem in the right way, thus obvious solutions cloud your perspective.-This NYT article has really helped my understanding of your point:-http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/science/brainlike-computers-learning-from-experience.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131229&_r=0
Complete thread:
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-19, 14:22
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-21, 19:06
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-21, 19:56
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-23, 04:26
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-23, 15:48
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-23, 17:10
- Matt: Dangerous AI? - David Turell, 2013-12-24, 01:08
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-23, 17:10
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-26, 05:16
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-26, 20:26
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-27, 00:12
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-27, 03:40
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-29, 15:00
- Matt: Negative thoughts about AI - David Turell, 2014-01-02, 15:08
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-29, 15:00
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-27, 03:40
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-27, 00:12
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-26, 20:26
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-23, 15:48
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-23, 04:26
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
David Turell,
2013-12-21, 19:56
- Matt: Dangerous AI? -
xeno6696,
2013-12-21, 19:06