Cambrian Explosion: afterthought (Introduction)

by David Turell @, Sunday, September 29, 2013, 21:43 (4051 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: Cells operate from stimuli and responses using information given them by intelligence. They are not intelligent in the senses I have described.
> 
> dhw; You have not described intelligence in any sense. You have agreed with my definition, and then simply reiterated your firm belief that in spite of cells possessing all the attributes I have listed, they are not intelligent!-
> I must keep repeating. They are under controls to use information they are given in the genome. That is not intelligence. Intelligence requires thoughtfulness and a brain.
> 
> dhw: There is two-way traffic between our brain cells and the rest. .... I do not include self-awareness as a prerequisite for thought. Please tell me what other attributes you require before you agree to a definition.-Am uneven two-way traffic. The brain controls by nerve signals. The brain gets chemical signalw from the cells.-
> 
> Dhw Can I tell you the origin [of cellular intelligence]? No. No-one can. If we could, there would be no need for any of our hypotheses and we would not be having this discussion.
> 
> DAVID: But the discussion is fun.
> 
> As with all the best forms of education, we have fun while we learn.-You cannot seem to understand the use of information by cells and want to call it intelligence. We are not discussing M1 or CIA intelligence. That is only information.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum