The Starchild Skull (Humans)

by David Turell , Monday, January 28, 2013, 00:37 (4100 days ago) @ BBella

bbella: Did you actually read the article? -Absolutely, and now twice. FoxP2 is a homeobox or Hox master gene. If Pye is so sure of his suppositions, why aren't regular scientists interested? 
Is there a conspiracy to hide from this information? Are the 'powers' afraid to tell the public? Why does he know what no one else cares to follow up on?-"What's the bottom line? That can only be determined when the entire Starchild genome is recovered and compared—nucleotide by nucleotide, base pair by base pair, codon by codon, amino acid by amino acid—with humans, Neanderthals, Denisovans, chimps, and gorillas. Whatever it is, most of the preliminary evidence indicates it is quite distinct from humans.-Most important, perhaps, to keep in mind is that our FOXP2 results are preliminary, as are the results from the earlier nuclear DNA fragments, and the mitochondrial DNA fragments. All three preliminary results are highly indicative of what the final result will be, but they cannot be considered absolute proof. They can, however, be considered proof that absolute proof will come when the Starchild's entire genome can finally be recovered."-Everything is preliminary and supposition. He is making money doing this sort of stuff. As I said before he validates his stuff by giving a very learned and true description of DNA and mitochondrial DNA. I am skeptical times two.