Rabbi Sacks (Introduction)

by romansh , Tuesday, January 01, 2013, 21:02 (4136 days ago) @ David Turell

Rom: Now for all his faults Dawkins has carefully avoided saying this. What he is adamant about is the nonsensical Christian (that is nonsensical for him and me) interpretations of a literal Christian God. 
> 
> My answer for Dawkins is not to answer him from a religious and biblical standpoint, for in that sense he is OK, but the science he uses to support his atheism is frankly very suspect as I will show, when my new book is finally out from the publisher. They start work on it this month, finally, having had it since mid-September.-And which atheism is that?