Plasma Cosmology and the Myth of it not Being Considered (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 21:32 (4547 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

From the wiki:
> > 
> > " Light element production without Big Bang nucleosynthesis (as required in e.g. Alfvén-Klein cosmology) has been discussed in the mainstream literature and was determined to produce excessive x-rays and gamma rays beyond that observed.[44][45] This issue has not been completely addressed by plasma cosmology proponents in their proposals."
> > 
> > Meaning: Scientists DO take it seriously, but it has problems it needs to solve. It's lack of mainstream acceptance has more to do with the fact it has holes, than for some Illuminati-like dissension-squashing.
> 
> No one has suggested Illuminati-like dissension-squashing. The rate of expansion far exceeds the predictions of the big bang, but they didn't throw it out with the bath water or start calling it psuedo-science, did they? BBT Can't account for galaxy rotation, but they didn't begin calling it creationist propaganda like they did with the EU/PC hypotheses.-
Back that one up. For the past 5 years, all I've heard is that supermassive black holes are the center of spiral galaxies.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"