Verification of the Big Bang (General)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Sunday, June 10, 2012, 21:38 (4550 days ago) @ xeno6696

You are arguing that the BBT explains a bunch of stuff, and to a certain extent it does, but a lot of its 'explanatory power' comes from either ignoring known physics, or using unobservable phenomena as a place holder. How is that ok?-I am not even saying that everything about the BBT is wrong, and in fact not even the Plasma Cosmology model says that everything about the BBT is wrong. There are areas where it is wrong, though, and there are areas where its predictions flat out fail. Here are a few good articles with supporting links.-http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/big-bang-vs-plasma-cosmology-competing-approaches-cosmos-In short, the recent literature on physics makes one nostalgic for anything as reasonable as a witch trial.-I am not even saying that the plasma model is correct, only that given the number of failed predictions, and the amount of froo froo framework being needed to prop up the existing model, isn't it time to consider that maybe, just maybe it is wrong?

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.