Turns out Random is Better (Evolution)

by David Turell , Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 21:55 (5196 days ago) @ xeno6696
edited by unknown, Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 22:16


> > Which again raises the question: Where did the information in DNA/RNA come from. Since we find it in the simplest organisms it had to be there with the first life.
> > > 
> 
> But we know the origins question lies in the middle ground between organic and biochem. However it arose.-Information in code requires an underlying code language to develop first, which then can be encoded or decoded. Code must be applied to the language which already exists. You haven't answered how that might work in the interval between organic and biochemical. I have no answer and think the question is unanswerable, unless language comes first and coding second. And then the issue of mistake correction. Evolution goes nowhere if trranslation is 99% correct. It needs to be 99.9999% or better. Did the correction modules exist from the moment early translation began? And how about the epigenetic rapid-change modules. Were they present in the earliest organisms at 3.5 bya when the Earth was still cooling, asteroids were still bombarding and volcanic activity was still in violent eruptions? All of the genome suite must be present or it won't work.
> 
 As far as I am concerned and comfortable with, He is concealed.
> > > 
> 
> On who's authority and knowledge? What makes your claim stronger and better than your Hasidic counterparts, -I'm so far from a Hasid in thinking. My sideburns could never curl! ) -
> > > A better question is to ask you how you know God is concealed? Where is the evidence of this? Where did you get this information? -My answer is no one has found Him far and proved it by any means, epecially the ones you demand. The only proof as I think about it is a negative proof: design is the only way that can work in the finite time alloted, given the two choices of random chance or design. 
> 
> I'm content to state that He is a universal intelligence at a quantum level of reality, which we can't get to anyway.
 
> 
> On a personal level, believing in Leprechauns is just as fair.- 
We know Leprechauns don't exist in any form, except imagination. I have given you reasons why I think design is the only way to go in understanding evolution. 
> 
> You should rephrase that as "Can I decode your thoughts?" Thoughts can be detected, we just don't understand the coding principle behind it. In my estimation this has never been done, so either God doesn't influence the world or...-You are correct, 'decode' is a better way of stating my point. PET scans will never find God any more than further scans will ever interpret thought, only detect it. -I don't know of anyone who has declared that God, if He exists, is detectable by any method, other than by disproving any other source of what we observe in reality.