Turns out Random is Better (Evolution)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, February 17, 2010, 14:44 (5202 days ago) @ xeno6696

As everyone has appeared to ignore this post, perhaps I should try to bring my thoughts a bit more into focus.-The paper that the article references is on a method to increase the chances of information getting out to its destination. It turns out that a process of truly random selection in terms of only sending small bits of the information through ( in this case, three) receivers improves the reception of the overall message--more information gets through when compared to the current method. [EDIT] The current method being that we've traditionally selected the cell tower with the strongest signal as the preferential one to send a message through, in other words, "intelligently."-Since biological information can also be modeled as bits, this result impacts biology in these ways:-1. Introducing randomness in the transmission process of genetic information means that randomness increases the chances that information will be successfully transferred to its target. -2. Those that would assert life is designed now have to mathematically justify how they would tell the difference between a random transmission and an intelligent one.-[EDITED]

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"