Catastrophes (Evolution)

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Saturday, November 22, 2008, 11:25 (5641 days ago)

There is an upcoming programme on Channel 4 (in UK):
 
This spectacular five-part series, presented by Tony Robinson, investigates the history of natural disasters, from the planet's beginnings to the present, putting a new perspective on our existence ... that we are the product of catastrophe. Using the latest CGI effects and featuring scientific experts, the series reveals how the evolution of life on Earth has been shaped by lethal catastrophes that have caused mass extinctions, almost to the point of wiping out life altogether. - http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/C/catastrophe/index.html - So, if there was a creator, or front-end-loading planner, did it pre-plan all these catastrophes, that could well have proved fatal to human emergence and survival?

Catastrophes

by David Turell @, Saturday, November 22, 2008, 16:13 (5641 days ago) @ George Jelliss

So, if there was a creator, or front-end-loading planner, did it pre-plan all these catastrophes, that could well have proved fatal to human emergence and survival? - That there have been five or six major extinctions, at least one with a 95% destruction of life (Permian) is not new news to anyone reading about what has happened to the Earth in the past since life began. What is amazing is that life is so tenacious that it survived asteroids, climate change, volcanic eruptions, and 'snowball Earth' when the planet was covered with ice. There are bacteria called extremophiles. They survive high temperture, low temperature, no oxygen, etc. David Raup's book : "Extinction; Bad Genes or Bad Luck?", is excellent on the subject. (1991) - My answer to the question: front-end-loading made life appear more quickly than chance odds would have created it, and more resilient than catastrophies could end it.

Catastrophes: snowball Earth from volcanoes?

by David Turell @, Tuesday, March 14, 2017, 14:25 (2607 days ago) @ David Turell

A new study looks at snowball Earth which occurred over 700 million years ago:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/13/a-perfect-storm-of-fire-and-ice-may-have-led-to-...

Researchers have pinpointed the start of what’s known as the Sturtian snowball Earth event to about 717 million years ago — give or take a few 100,000 years. At around that time, a huge volcanic event devastated an area from present-day Alaska to Greenland. Coincidence?

Harvard professors Francis Macdonald and Robin Wordsworth thought not.

Geological and chemical studies of this region, known as the Franklin large igneous province, showed that volcanic rocks erupted through sulfur-rich sediments, which would have been pushed into the atmosphere during eruption as sulfur dioxide. When sulfur dioxide gets into the upper layers of the atmosphere, it’s very good at blocking solar radiation. The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, which shot about 10 million metric tons of sulfur into the air, reduced global temperatures about 1 degree Fahrenheit for a year.

Sulfur dioxide is most effective at blocking solar radiation if it gets past the tropopause, the boundary separating the troposphere and stratosphere. If it reaches this height, it’s less likely to be brought back down to earth in precipitation or mixed with other particles, extending its presence in the atmosphere from about a week to about a year. The height of the tropopause barrier all depends on the background climate of the planet — the cooler the planet, the lower the tropopause.

“In periods of Earth’s history when it was very warm, volcanic cooling would not have been very important because the Earth would have been shielded by this warm, high tropopause,” said Wordsworth. “In cooler conditions, Earth becomes uniquely vulnerable to having these kinds of volcanic perturbations to climate.”

***

Another important aspect is where the sulfur dioxide plumes reach the stratosphere. Due to continental drift, 717 million years ago, the Franklin large igneous province where these eruptions took place was situated near the equator, the entry point for most of the solar radiation that keeps the Earth warm.

So, an effective light-reflecting gas entered the atmosphere at just the right location and height to cause cooling. But another element was needed to form the perfect storm scenario. After all, the Pinatubo eruption had similar qualities but its cooling effect only lasted about a year.

The eruptions throwing sulfur into the air 717 million years ago weren’t one-off explosions of single volcanoes like Pinatubo. The volcanoes in question spanned almost 2,000 miles across Canada and Greenland. Instead of singularly explosive eruptions, these volcanoes can erupt more continuously like those in Hawaii and Iceland today. The researchers demonstrated that a decade or so of continual eruptions from this type of volcanoes could have poured enough aerosols into the atmosphere to rapidly destabilize the climate.

“Cooling from aerosols doesn’t have to freeze the whole planet; it just has to drive the ice to a critical latitude. Then the ice does the rest,” said Macdonald.

The more ice, the more sunlight is reflected and the cooler the planet becomes. Once the ice reaches latitudes around present-day California, the positive feedback loop takes over and the runaway snowball effect is pretty much unstoppable.

Comment: Back to terrible events on Earth which were necessary to create the livable Earth we have today. God uses evolutionary processes which today can be dangerous to humans. We are learning to predict earthquakes which are a necessary part of plate tectonics. Hurray for big brains!

Catastrophes

by BBella @, Saturday, November 22, 2008, 17:25 (5641 days ago) @ George Jelliss

So, if there was a creator, or front-end-loading planner, did it pre-plan all these catastrophes, that could well have proved fatal to human emergence and survival?< - If there is even a remote possibility of a front-end-loading partner, which is what the query of this site seems to be about more times than not, then why not also take into consideration the idea that we (earthlings) could be the product of an &apos;other worldly&apos; creation that keep watch over us, making sure all is being maintained and going well during and after earths catastrophic events? I know it&apos;s not something this site wants to take the time to discuss or throw in the mix...but, it is another aspect that begs consideration, in my mind anyway. If we are already replacing our own organs from T-cells, why is it not possible that another species, far advance than our own, could use this planet as an experiment, or for whatever reason, to create beings with the DNA this planet had to offer, combined with their own DNA, to create a new species? May this answer some questions or fill in some blanks about time and missing link questions as well as other questions that seem without answers? Of course the &apos;God&apos; question will always be pondered by open minds, but, it seems to me, there should be room in open minds for the many aspects of our being here that could be pondered as well. I know nothing for sure (except that I AM)...but I&apos;m not above exploring any possibility.

Catastrophes

by David Turell @, Sunday, November 23, 2008, 00:19 (5641 days ago) @ BBella

If we are already replacing our own organs from T-cells, why is it not possible that another species, far advance than our own, could use this planet as an experiment, or for whatever reason, to create beings with the DNA this planet had to offer, combined with their own DNA, to create a new species? - We use stem cells not T-cells for the research to create organ replacements. T-cells are those immune cells that HIV destroys to conquer the invaded human body. - As far as extraplanetary visits are concerned, the nearest star is four light-years away and the closest planets orbiting a star are very much further, and none so far are like Earth, and astronomier are looking at the closest stars to spot planets. Perhaps with the newer space telescope in development they will see further and find an earth-like planet, one that can support life. So there is the time-for-travel problem, and your proposed species would have to be very long-lived or know how to stop ageing. Another problem with the idea is SETI has never had an intelligable signal. There are two books available: Rare Earth and Privileged Planet, both of which think Earth is an exceedingly rare type of planet. They suggest we might be alone.

Catastrophes

by BBella @, Sunday, November 23, 2008, 20:22 (5640 days ago) @ David Turell

We use stem cells not T-cells for the research to create organ replacements. T-cells are those immune cells that HIV destroys to conquer the invaded human body. > - Sorry, I meant stem cells.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> As far as extraplanetary visits are concerned, the nearest star is four light-years away and the closest planets orbiting a star are very much further, and none so far are like Earth, and astronomier are looking at the closest stars to spot planets. Perhaps with the newer space telescope in development they will see further and find an earth-like planet, one that can support life. So there is the time-for-travel problem, and your proposed species would have to be very long-lived or know how to stop ageing. Another problem with the idea is SETI has never had an intelligable signal. There are two books available: Rare Earth and Privileged Planet, both of which think Earth is an exceedingly rare type of planet. They suggest we might be alone.< - I&apos;ve read many books and websites that suggest we are alone and many that say we are not. There is no definitive answer with this subject just as there is none for the question of a God. To me, just by observation of what people claim, there is plenty of evidence for both! But that&apos;s neither here nor there, as what I am pondering isn&apos;t about whether it is a possibility as much as that &apos;if&apos; we discuss it as if there is a possibility, like we discuss the motive of God as if he &apos;is&apos; then possibly some questions may find answers that is discussed here. If we can discuss the purpose of a creator God for creating this mess, whether &apos;he&apos; is loving or not...it seems we could bring ourselves to discuss the possibility of less omnipotent beings that may have even less purpose than love for creating us that actually makes more sense, in my mind. - Your reasoning above does not, again, in my mind, in anyway discount the possibility that there could be a race of beings far older and more advanced than ours that could travel light years or within dimensions in moments, as well as have the capability and technology to create exactly what we are and have influence here on earth without our actual collective acknowlegment. Most of our discussions here are, more times than not, about a being (God) that has done (and still does) way more fantastical exploits than what I am pondering, yet, is discussed invariably every day. My wanting to explore the possibility of a species that can do less than God yet more than earthly humans seem somehow less fantastic, in my eyes, and more plausible and, even more worthy of discussion here, since we do have more &apos;visual&apos; evidence of this possibility than we do of the elusive &apos;God&apos; we all seem to discuss so often. - My purpose in mentioning an advance race of beings is my questioning how we came to be here and advanced as far as we have in our scientist&apos;s alloted amount of time in which to do it in. There are many other unanswered questions about many things that could possibly be answered with this other worldly 3rd element in mind. I am not offended my question has been brushed aside like a bothersome child&apos;s wide eyed wonderings...I just find it curious the reasons to dismiss this idea so quickly, so not to ponder or discuss it and wipe it quickly off the table for more worthy subjects, seems so weak, and yet, the &apos;God&apos; subject and &apos;his&apos; purpose for creating us, is discussed endlessly as if the evidence for such a being is so great! - Of course, I know one of the most popular discussions is about how it all began in the first place as well as the motivation...yet, it seems to me, and I may be wrong, what most discussions are about is the time element and how we got from point a to point b so quickly. So again, in my mind, this 3rd element could be the answer for many questions that remain illusive as well as some questions that are just left for dead with no scientific ponderings at all, like the very &apos;other worldly&apos; strange things people claim to see and experience every day. Again, I am not offended, just curiously perplexed at how close minded we open minded people can be sometimes.

Catastrophes

by David Turell @, Monday, November 24, 2008, 00:05 (5640 days ago) @ BBella

I&apos;ve read many books and websites that suggest we are alone and many that say we are not. There is no definitive answer with this subject just as there is none for the question of a God. To me, just by observation of what people claim, there is plenty of evidence for both! . &#13;&#10; - BBella: I&apos;m not being closed-minded. The research in DNA going on at the moment is to look at the so-called tree of life, and see if it is consistent with Darwin. Within a few years the DNA tree will go from the earliest Archaea to us. We already know that human DNA has lots of incorporated virus DNA. DNA from a foreign planet will pop up and we&apos;ll know the answer to your question. - My previous answer was to indicate to you that what we know so far is against the idea and we really can&apos;t go further in that direction with the methods used so far. What I have just described is a valid way of finding out.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Monday, November 24, 2008, 15:25 (5639 days ago) @ BBella

BBella has raised the question of whether the universe may contain other forms of life, more advanced than our own, which may even have experimented with us here on Earth. - You say you are &quot;not offended my question has been brushed aside like a bothersome child&apos;s wide eyed wonderings...I just find it curious the reasons to dismiss this idea so quickly....and yet, the &apos;God&apos; subject and &apos;his&apos; purpose for creating us, is discussed endlessly as if the evidence for such a being is so great!&apos; - First of all, I do apologize if you have the impression that your question has been brushed aside. So far David alone has responded, and I can only plead for myself that in the two days that have elapsed since you posted it, I haven&apos;t had time to comment. The (for me very interesting) discussion with Mark has occupied the time I had available. So please be patient with all of us. - The point you make seems to me quite devastatingly accurate! We are prepared endlessly to discuss the nature of an invisible, omnipotent being to which we attribute innumerable, idealized characteristics, and yet whose very existence is doubtful. But the moment people talk of other forms of life (e.g. extra-terrestrials, ghosts), they are often dismissed as cranks, sometimes even by those who believe in God. I would like to thank you for raising the subject, and to add a few thoughts of my own, with a view to opening up the discussion. (I&apos;m changing the thread title, as &quot;Catastrophes&quot; no longer seems appropriate.)&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;1) Clearly the existence of such beings won&apos;t help us solve the problem of origins. Instead of asking how we got here, we would have to ask how they got here. But the same question can be asked of God&apos;s origin, and in any case the forum is not confined to discussing origins. - 2) If God exists, there is no reason at all why he should not have created other forms of life elsewhere. Why confine himself to one tiny planet? - 3) If God does not exist, there is no reason why there shouldn&apos;t be other planets elsewhere in the universe where conditions are suitable for chance to bring together the materials for other forms of life. - 4) What evidence is there of such forms? None of us can possibly read all books on all subjects. Some experts have devoted themselves to studying the possibilities, and if they disagree, then they are in the same boat as the pro-God, anti-God lobbies, and we should at least consider what evidence they have to offer. (The same applies to the possibility of an afterlife.) - 5) Who knows what technology we might have developed in, say, ten thousand years ... if we are still around? Space exploration and colonization must be a distinct possibility. If we accept that as a hypothesis, why not go back ten thousand years and imagine a planet like ours, from which beings have set forth to explore us? Maybe even colonize us? - 6) For those who are now tut-tutting, and mumbling, &quot;Science fiction&quot;, it might be an idea to discuss BBella&apos;s initial point: what is the difference between debating God and debating other forms of life?

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 01:26 (5639 days ago) @ dhw

2) If God exists, there is no reason at all why he should not have created other forms of life elsewhere. Why confine himself to one tiny planet?&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> 6) For those who are now tut-tutting, and mumbling, &quot;Science fiction&quot;, it might be an idea to discuss BBella&apos;s initial point: what is the difference between debating God and debating other forms of life? - On point 6 I agree. There is no reason why we shouldn&apos;t explore every possibility. However, on point 2 I want to point out that the universe we live in is uniform in how matter is spread out, and all of the universe has the same elements, unless the ones we created are unique, because we are alone. It appears that life forms elsewhere should be built as we are from carbon, which is the simplest way to combine elements to form living organic chemicals. Granted the DNA eleswhere may have different programming. I mean this broadly, not that God programmed it, but that the inherent programming that developed on another planet was different, and it well could be.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 18:06 (5638 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by unknown, Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 18:14

2) If God exists, there is no reason at all why he should not have created other forms of life elsewhere. Why confine himself to one tiny planet?&#13;&#10;> &#13;&#10;> > 6) For those who are now tut-tutting, and mumbling, &quot;Science fiction&quot;, it might be an idea to discuss BBella&apos;s initial point: what is the difference between debating God and debating other forms of life?&#13;&#10;> &#13;&#10;> On point 6 I agree. There is no reason why we shouldn&apos;t explore every possibility. However, on point 2 I want to point out that the universe we live in is uniform in how matter is spread out, and all of the universe has the same elements, unless the ones we created are unique, because we are alone. - David, in saying &quot;the ones we created&quot; above, do you mean we created by evolving? - >It appears that life forms elsewhere should be built as we are from carbon, which is the simplest way to combine elements to form living organic chemicals. Granted the DNA eleswhere may have different programming. I mean this broadly, not that God programmed it, but that the inherent programming that developed on another planet was different, and it well could be. - &apos;If&apos; we were created from a combination of these beings DNA and our own evolutionary beings (animals/apes/etc) DNA here on earth, wouldn&apos;t it be difficult for us to detect within ourselves this duplicity? As we only have our own beings, animal, etc., here on earth to compare it to. Our own DNA is only a certain small percentage different than our animal cousins here (apes), correct? What or where did the other DNA that is not like the ape come from, or what is it similar to (forgive my ignorance)? Could that small percentage of DNA that is of different programming, you speak of above, be from our benefactors from elsewhere? - Please forgive my error in details as I am one to believe the devil is in the details, and as anyone can see, this belief has never served me, which is why I look forward to this discussion, so to get some of my own thinking fleshed out and more concrete. Of all I&apos;ve read over the years, as my interests are so wide, certain patterns seem to stick in my mind while the details seem to slip away and fade.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 00:51 (5638 days ago) @ BBella

However, on point 2 I want to point out that the universe we live in is uniform in how matter is spread out, and all of the universe has the same elements, unless the ones we created are unique, because we are alone. &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> David, in saying &quot;the ones we created&quot; above, do you mean we created by evolving? > &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> >It appears that life forms elsewhere should be built as we are from carbon, which is the simplest way to combine elements to form living organic chemicals. Granted the DNA eleswhere may have different programming. I mean this broadly, not that God programmed it, but that the inherent programming that developed on another planet was different, and it well could be. >&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> &apos;If&apos; we were created from a combination of these beings DNA and our own evolutionary beings (animals/apes/etc) DNA here on earth, wouldn&apos;t it be difficult for us to detect within ourselves this duplicity? As we only have our own beings, animal, etc., here on earth to compare it to. Our own DNA is only a certain small percentage different than our animal cousins here (apes), correct? What or where did the other DNA that is not like the ape come from, or what is it similar to (forgive my ignorance)? > - When I said all the universe has the same &apos;elements&apos;, I am talking about the 92 original atomic elements. Remember the &apos;periodic table &apos; in chemistry. Atomic scientists have now made about 16 more, that exist nowhere else, unless there are other beings as smart as us or smarter. - As far as DNA is concerned as I mentioned before, the evolution of DNA is being studied from the earliest simple organisms to humans, making a whole DNA tree of evolution. Virus DNA has been found to have added itself (somehow) to human DNA. These comparison studies appear to be indicating that chimpanzee and human DNA are about 95% the same, not 98% as previously thought, and part of this is the RNA system which is way more complex than originally imagined by the geneticists. - At some point in time the whole DNA/RNA story will be known during Evolution on Earth. If odd programming of DNA is seen that matches nothing in that story, then we will know some came from elsewhere, which is your question. But that ability will be available some time in the future. In the meantime we will have &apos;just suppose&apos; questions and discussions.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Friday, December 05, 2008, 17:17 (5628 days ago) @ David Turell

However, on point 2 I want to point out that the universe we live in is uniform in how matter is spread out, and all of the universe has the same elements, unless the ones we created are unique, because we are alone. - > When I said all the universe has the same &apos;elements&apos;, I am talking about the 92 original atomic elements. Remember the &apos;periodic table &apos; in chemistry. Atomic scientists have now made about 16 more, that exist nowhere else, unless there are other beings as smart as us or smarter. - Now I see what you are saying David, thank you for being patient with me and clearing that up. &quot;The ones we created&quot; then are the new atomic elements the scientist have recently created. Gotcha there. So, you are saying that even if there are other life forms, where ever they are, possibly even in a so-called &apos;after life,&apos; they should all be made up of the same elements that we have here on earth, that is except for the new ones we recently created. I can see that. And yet, as has been said, they could be at least as smart as we are, and if they are, then they may know a thing or two about creating new elements as well. So, can I deduce from that, new elements can be created by combining or splitting old elements, correct? Is that like gene splicing? Creating a new being from two old ones? - > > >It appears that life forms elsewhere should be built as we are from carbon, which is the simplest way to combine elements to form living organic chemicals. Granted the DNA eleswhere may have different programming. I mean this broadly, not that God programmed it, but that the inherent programming that developed on another planet was different, and it well could be. > - Again, forgive my ignorance, I&apos;m sure I could retake all my science classes, or find out some other way, but, I&apos;m hoping to flesh out some thoughts and not get side tracked or bogged down in &apos;new&apos; studies, but just skim the surface of comprehension for a purpose here. You are saying above, carbon is the vehicle used by elements (old and new), or carbon uses elements, or carbon and elements are attracted to each other, so to form living organic chemicals, which is what different life forms, seen or unseen, are made of. And, according to it&apos;s &quot;programming,&quot; which most likely comes from it&apos;s environment, is what determines what the form will look like. So, basically, everything &quot;that is&quot; is all made from the same &apos;stuff&apos; and are actually the same &apos;thing&apos; just looks different according to how it is formed? - > &#13;&#10;> As far as DNA is concerned as I mentioned before, the evolution of DNA is being studied from the earliest simple organisms to humans, making a whole DNA tree of evolution. Virus DNA has been found to have added itself (somehow) to human DNA. These comparison studies appear to be indicating that chimpanzee and human DNA are about 95% the same, not 98% as previously thought, and part of this is the RNA system which is way more complex than originally imagined by the geneticists.&#13;&#10;> - To reduce the above to its simplest terms that even a kindergarten could understand (which is sometimes what level my mind works), and to reiterate one more time what you are saying; regardless of the different combinations of elements carbon uses to create new life forms, all is made from the same basic ingredients, correct? Could this be like painting many different pictures but only having so many colors of the spectrum to work with? You are saying that there could be many different forms of life but they all have the same basic elements if they were created with universal elements and so if there are other life forms, they still would be what we are just look different, possibly. And of course, there is still that question of what we could do in another 1000 yrs, technology wise, with all this &apos;stuff&apos; we have to work with. - &#13;&#10;> At some point in time the whole DNA/RNA story will be known during Evolution on Earth. If odd programming of DNA is seen that matches nothing in that story, then we will know some came from elsewhere, which is your question. But that ability will be available some time in the future. In the meantime we will have &apos;just suppose&apos; questions and discussions. - On an aside: Is reading DNA/RNA like reading the &apos;patterns&apos; that elements and carbon used to make each life form? Would that be similar as finding out exactly what combination of colors Davinci used on the Mona Lisa and being able to know exactly which colors he used first, etc.? Not sure if that metaphor would work here...but if you can think of a better one, that would be of great help (hope I&apos;m not asking too much). - So, even if we did find out there is different DNA programming that we cannot attribute to anything we&apos;ve found yet, it would still be the same universal elements, right? - Thank you David for you patience with me...it is truly appreciated.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Saturday, December 06, 2008, 00:59 (5628 days ago) @ BBella

BBella: Without quoting your message let me answer in this way. There are 92 basic elements in the universe and they are everywhere, especially carbon. For example in our solar system the Earth has iron, but Jupiter does not. The elements after helium, hydrogen and lithium were all formed in the hot high pressure furnace of stars, by combination and growing in size as added together, and were scattered when the stars grew old and exploded. Carbon atoms can be strung together in long chains and various loops. For example, six carbons in a loop make benzene. Silicon has this same property, but is not as versatile as carbon in making molecules compatable with life as we know it. One DNA molecule is 6 feet long, if stretched out. As you know DNA and RNA are codes for making protein and for telling genes what to do. I think you understand now that DNA/RNA patterns on Earth are peculiar to Earth. Foreign DNA will stand out like a sore thumb. If life is present elsewhere based on our knowledge of the 92 elements, it must be carbon based as it is here. - The universe is 13.7 billion years old. Our sun is 5 billion years old and the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Life appeared on Earth at about 3.6 billion years ago. With the right conditions on a planet life appears rather quickly. Considering the size of the universe, 100 billion galaxies, each with 100 billion stars carbon-based life should be out there, but it takes a very special planet to have life. Considering all the special things about Earth, the number will be quite small. - Does that help?

Other Forms of Life

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Saturday, December 06, 2008, 15:29 (5627 days ago) @ BBella

Possibilities for life based on other chain-molecules are surveyed on this wikipedia page: - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_biochemistry - The science section is followed by a comprehensive list of examples from science fiction. - It seems that carbon and oxygen based life is the most likely, simply because these elements are the most common and most stable throughout the universe. - There are also speculations about non-molecular life forms, such as based on electromagnetic connections within plasma. - The possibilities for imaginative fiction are endless.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Sunday, December 07, 2008, 14:29 (5626 days ago) @ George Jelliss

It seems that carbon and oxygen based life is the most likely, simply because these elements are the most common and most stable throughout the universe.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10; - > The possibilities for imaginative fiction are endless. - George and I agree. The constraints of universal chemistry mean that other life will be based on carbon/oxygen and may have advanced to a human-like form or have varied in other directions, unless there is a God who set up one evolutionary pattern in DNA for the whole universe, getting the same result in each place. The latter is part of what we are debating on this website. Certainly, as dhw has pointed out, we don&apos;t know if God exists with absolute proof, and we have no proof that life exists elsewhere. We can fictionalize anything.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 21:57 (4938 days ago) @ David Turell

&#13;&#10;> At some point in time the whole DNA/RNA story will be known during Evolution on Earth. -DNA studies continue and have turned up &apos;huge&apos; DNA in marine viruses.-http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/57776/

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 16:36 (4937 days ago) @ David Turell

David has drawn our attention to an article in The Scientist concerning a giant marine virus. Quite apart from the extraordinary nature of these viruses and their effect on life, I was struck by the following sentence:-&quot;Once thought not to exist in marine environments, scientists now realize that there are some 50 million viruses in every milliliter of seawater.&quot;-Oops! Slight oversight! So what else have they missed/are they missing? And what will they have discovered a hundred years from now? People can only base their beliefs on what they know today, but if you add the unsolved mysteries (e.g. origin of the universe and life, nature of consciousness) to current &apos;truths&apos; that may well turn out to be false (e.g. aspects of evolution, the material make-up and history of the universe), it&apos;s amazing that people can commit themselves to any sort of definitive ...ism. When they discover that dark energy is in fact BBella-energy, will she get her Nobel Prize?

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 17:32 (5638 days ago) @ dhw

Thank you dhw for bringing this subject to a credible, or at least, to an intelligent discussion level. Even if this discussion goes nowhere I do appreciate your consideration of the points in my post. - > 1) Clearly the existence of such beings won&apos;t help us solve the problem of origins.> - I did take into consideration in my last post that a discussion about other worldly intervention will probably not shed any more light on the origin of our universe. And, altho it doesn&apos;t solve the problem of origins, it could shed some light on certain blanks and questions that has been discussed here, if considered, between the origin and the present, which is my main reason for bringing it up. There have been times I have wanted to interject ideas along this line in the discussions here, or elsewhere, of this possibility, so to bring in another aspect of &apos;possibilities&apos; to fill in blanks, but, I always feel the same reaction of dismissal is met, or will be met. It seems, only in discussing it with the &apos;choir&apos; is there any discussion at all and that&apos;s like discussing God at a bible study. - >Instead of asking how we got here, we would have to ask how they got here. But the same question can be asked of God&apos;s origin, and in any case the forum is not confined to discussing origins.> - The question of these beings origin, of course, would be just as illusive to us as our own origin is at this time. But, possibly, they have more info than we do about their own origin, being that they are a more advanced race, which they would have to be to have created us, or for us to be a &apos;product&apos; of them. We may have less info on how we came to be because our &apos;benefactors&apos; may be waiting for the &apos;right&apos; time to let us in on it, or, more probable, are allowing us to figure it our on our own, which may be how they came to &apos;know&apos; their own origin as well, who can know? - &#13;&#10;> 4) What evidence is there of such forms? None of us can possibly read all books on all subjects. Some experts have devoted themselves to studying the possibilities, and if they disagree, then they are in the same boat as the pro-God, anti-God lobbies, and we should at least consider what evidence they have to offer. (The same applies to the possibility of an afterlife.)> - I agree. And, to me, it is more understandable to discount a creator God than to discount a more advanced race of beings as our creators or benefactors. Many times, within certain discussion threads, we have asked the question, how could a loving God create such a savage creation as we have here? It would seem more plausible, to me, the &quot;creator&apos;s&quot; of this experiment, if there are such, could be more interested in the experiment itself rather than our &apos;feelings&apos; about the experiment. Just as we ourselves are rarely interested in our experimentations with lower species in creating what is better for our own. These beings may be more interested in what this species can do for them, rather than what they can do for us. Then, too, as we are now evolving &apos;feelings&apos; for our lower species, and want to &apos;harm&apos; them less and less, possibly our creators have also, or will also, develop these same feelings for us? The more we see our commonality among species the more we grow feelings for them. Maybe the more they know about us the more they see themselves? Just like us with the lower species on our own planet. - &#13;&#10;> 5) Who knows what technology we might have developed in, say, ten thousand years ... if we are still around? Space exploration and colonization must be a distinct possibility. If we accept that as a hypothesis, why not go back ten thousand years and imagine a planet like ours, from which beings have set forth to explore us? Maybe even colonize us?> - I can imagine our society far advanced in much less time than ten thousand years. Even in a couple more hundred years, if the question of war and peace is ever solved, I believe we may even advance to what we are now supposing has happened in this discussion, and more. Our capabilities are only limited by our imaginations as well as our ability to truly care for each other. - Thanks again dhw for the opportunity to at least consider unlocking this door.

Other Forms of Life

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 10:39 (5637 days ago) @ BBella

Ideas about other life forms being involved with our origin or evolution have of course been imagined at length by numerous science fiction writers. The speculations of theologians are in much the same category. - I recall a short story, but I forget the exact details, which ended with the discovery that we are really Martians. - A classic is Arthur C. Clarke&apos;s &quot;Childhood&apos;s End&quot; in which an alien race, who bear a resemblance to devils, act as midwife to the transformation of the human race to a new form. - But my favourite are the mice in Douglas Adams&apos; &quot;Hitch Hiker&apos;s Guide to the Galaxy&quot; which are in fact the manifestation in our world of multidimensional beings who have been conducting experiments on us, while deceiving us into thinking we were performing experiments on them. - Even the Fantasist Royal, Sir Martin Rees, speculated in his TV Series &quot;What we still don&apos;t know&quot;, that we, and perhaps our whole universe, could be a computer simulation by some advanced beings in a parallel universe. - The &quot;anthropic&quot; question of how the parameters of our universe were set to just the right &quot;goldilocks&quot; values for us to evolve, has also been ascribed to super-scientists in a previous universe setting them to the optimal values. - None of these speculations of course answers the ultimate origin question. I quite like Lee Smolin&apos;s conjectures about evolving universes being born from black holes. - However my preferred answer, as I&apos;ve expressed before, based on the logical principle of Ockham&apos;s Razor, is that the universe appeared as a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot;, involving no pre-existing intelligence.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Thursday, November 27, 2008, 01:37 (5637 days ago) @ George Jelliss

However my preferred answer, as I&apos;ve expressed before, based on the logical principle of Ockham&apos;s Razor, is that the universe appeared as a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot;, involving no pre-existing intelligence. < - As I have stated before, I disagree with George. Occam (my spelling) has to be extended to the following considerations or is not logical. The only void-like space we know is the vacuum in this universe. We cannot know what is outside our universe. It is expanding and should be expanding into an absolute void. There may be an absolute void, outside our universe, with no energy or &apos;virtual&apos; energy particles. It is a possibility it may be like our universe with &apos;virtual&apos; quantum particles, popping in and out of existence in the space between galaxies. The Big Bang may represent a quantum fluctuation within a space like our universe has, but that seems unreasonable, since our universe has a finite beginning. Where is that other space now, beyond the background microwave radiation (from the Big Bang) at the edge of the universe? What George wants is an eternal space, small in size, with virtual particles, and then he can have his quantum fluctuation which produces a universe with 10 to the 8oth power of particles. Certainly, an eternal &apos;something&apos; gets rid of the possibility of a &apos;creation&apos;.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 19:26 (5623 days ago) @ David Turell

However my preferred answer, as I&apos;ve expressed before, based on the logical principle of Ockham&apos;s Razor, is that the universe appeared as a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot;, involving no pre-existing intelligence. <&#13;&#10;> &#13;&#10;> As I have stated before, I disagree with George. Occam (my spelling) has to be extended to the following considerations or is not logical. The only void-like space we know is the vacuum in this universe. We cannot know what is outside our universe. It is expanding and should be expanding into an absolute void. There may be an absolute void, outside our universe, with no energy or &apos;virtual&apos; energy particles. It is a possibility it may be like our universe with &apos;virtual&apos; quantum particles, popping in and out of existence in the space between galaxies. The Big Bang may represent a quantum fluctuation within a space like our universe has, but that seems unreasonable, since our universe has a finite beginning. - David, How can we know for sure universe had a finite beginning, as in, nothing was before it? Can&apos;t universe be a product of what was before, whatever that was, if indeed universe had a &apos;beginning?&apos; Like a new born, universe may be a product of that which was before, like with the scientist you mentioned earlier, that created new elements from that which already was, yet, they are brand new elements. If we have nothing from before to compare to, can&apos;t what IS now just be &apos;new&apos; creation from the old? - &#13;&#10;>Where is that other space now, beyond the background microwave radiation (from the Big Bang) at the edge of the universe? What George wants is an eternal space, small in size, with virtual particles, and then he can have his quantum fluctuation which produces a universe with 10 to the 8oth power of particles. Certainly, an eternal &apos;something&apos; gets rid of the possibility of a &apos;creation&apos;. - David, you wrote: &quot;certainly, an eternal something gets rid of the possibility of a creation.&quot; Can you explain what this sentence means?

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 22:15 (5623 days ago) @ BBella

David, How can we know for sure universe had a finite beginning, as in, nothing was before it? Can&apos;t universe be a product of what was before, whatever that was, if indeed universe had a &apos;beginning?&apos; > &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> David, you wrote: &quot;certainly, an eternal something gets rid of the possibility of a creation.&quot; Can you explain what this sentence means? - BBella: Perhaps I was not clear enough in my preceding sentences. there are only two possibilities before our universe appeared: either there was something or there was nothing. Leibnitz raised the question almost four centuries ago: &quot;why is there something rather than nothing?&quot; - George wants our universe to appear out of a quantum fluctuation, that is from a pre-existing space like the one in our universe that has &apos;virtual&apos; quanta popping in and out of existence. George must assume or claim that such a space always existed, and therefore is eternal. But if there was an absolute void, no quanta at all to pop in and out, then there was nothing, the other possibility. - I happen to accept the Greek philosophy that there has to be a &apos;first cause&apos; to give us something. You really cannot get something from nothing. Goerge will claim that the first cause is an eternal space with quanta, no willed creation. From, my research I think first cause is a universal intellect,called God by religions, and He created our universe from nothing, from an absolute void. That is what I meant in the sentence you questioned.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Friday, December 05, 2008, 17:35 (5628 days ago) @ George Jelliss

However my preferred answer, as I&apos;ve expressed before, based on the logical principle of Ockham&apos;s Razor, is that the universe appeared as a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot;, involving no pre-existing intelligence. - George, even tho the universe as we know it may have appeared from a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot; this doesn&apos;t discount the possibility of an older, more advanced life form coming before us, or us being a product of another older life form other than ourselves, right?

Other Forms of Life

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Saturday, December 06, 2008, 14:59 (5627 days ago) @ BBella

However my preferred answer, as I&apos;ve expressed before, based on the logical principle of Ockham&apos;s Razor, is that the universe appeared as a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot;, involving no pre-existing intelligence.&#13;&#10;> &#13;&#10;> George, even tho the universe as we know it may have appeared from a &quot;fluctuation in the void&quot; this doesn&apos;t discount the possibility of an older, more advanced life form coming before us, or us being a product of another older life form other than ourselves, right? - I just go by the evidence. If you can come up with evidence of such beings I&apos;m prepared to accept your hypothesis. Otherwise it is no better than fiction.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 20:24 (5623 days ago) @ George Jelliss

I just go by the evidence. If you can come up with evidence of such beings I&apos;m prepared to accept your hypothesis. Otherwise it is no better than fiction. - What is it that you have evidence for that you have the most faith, or belief in? Hundreds of thousands of eye witness accounts of seeing or experiencing other worldly beings over thousands of years would seem somewhat a kind of evidence that should account for something other than science fiction, even if these &apos;beings&apos; are no more than a figment of their imaginations, it is something! Sometimes many people witness the same phenomenon all at the same time. If so many &apos;reliable&apos; scientist agree they see or believe the same thing is so, how is that more reliable than many thousands of people that see the same thing and believe it is so? Isn&apos;t it just a matter of choice of &apos;who&apos;s&apos; accounts we choose to rely on for what we believe?

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 14:09 (5637 days ago) @ BBella

BBella writes: &quot;And, to me, it is more understandable to discount a Creator God than to discount a more advanced race of beings as our creators or benefactors. Many times, within certain discussion threads, we have asked the question, how could a loving God create such a savage creation as we have here? It would seem more plausible, to me, the &quot;creators&quot; of the experiment, if there are such, could be more interested in the experiment itself rather than our &apos;feelings&apos; about the experiment.&quot; - I would suggest that all gods are &quot;a more advanced race of beings&quot;, but maybe terminology is raising its ugly head again. Right from the start of this forum, we&apos;ve been hampered by the lack of a single term which would indicate the force that made the universe, but which would not attribute any qualities to it. The moment someone says &quot;God&quot;, along come the attachments: &quot;loving&quot;, &quot;omnipotent&quot;,&#13;&#10;&quot;perfect&quot;, &quot;all good&quot; etc., so &quot;God&quot; and &quot;savage&quot; sound almost like a contradiction. A savage ET doesn&apos;t sound quite so jarring. Once we neutralize the concept (as in David&apos;s panentheism), we are free to speculate according to the evidence of the world as it is. Perhaps you yourself can think of a suitable term. - Your scenario, however, suggests two types of force: one made the universe, and one made life on Earth. This adds at least one more link to the chain, as it = A (universe-maker) may have made B (extra-terrestrial) which may have made C (= us). It simplifies matters to attribute the qualities of B to A, which gives us the same explanation as you have suggested, i.e. A could be more interested in the experiment than in our feelings about it. But despite Ockham, the simplest explanation is not necessarily the right one. That is why we need to know what evidence there is for extraterrestrial and other forms of life, and in that category I would also include the evidence for an afterlife. If our identity is not confined to our physical cells, as seems to be indicated by NDEs and OBEs, we cannot discount forms of life beyond what we now regard as physical. - In your last paragraph, you write: &quot;The more we see commonality among species the more we grow feelings for them.&quot; And you express the hope that whatever created us might do the same. For all levels, human and &quot;divine&quot;, I can only echo your sentiments. As Hamlet put it: &quot;&apos;Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished.&quot;

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 19:06 (5623 days ago) @ dhw

I would suggest that all gods are &quot;a more advanced race of beings&quot;, - Yes, it seems &quot;God&quot; is a term that was used in the past to cover any advanced being. And then, the word &quot;angel,&quot; popped up from the bible (not sure if it was used before that), which gave us the idea that a being could be lower than the gods yet a little higher than our lowly selves. Then, the 50&apos;s evolved the term &quot;alien,&quot; but still attributed pretty much the same qualities as the beings before, still, a more advanced being. Slowly, as we have become &quot;more advanced&quot; ourselves, our view of these beings (whether they exist or not) evolves as well as our terms for &quot;them.&quot; &quot;They&quot; seem to becoming less like gods and more like ourselves, yet still, just more technologically, or however, advanced than ourselves. They, these gods, remain &apos;out there&apos; because they are &apos;better&apos; at something, than ourselves. Maybe one day we will become as we aspire them to be? Maybe that&apos;s &apos;their&apos; purpose? - &#13;&#10;>terminology is raising its ugly head again. Right from the start of this forum, we&apos;ve been hampered by the lack of a single term which would indicate the force that made the universe, but which would not attribute any qualities to it. - To acknowledge or &apos;believe&apos; there was a force before the universe that made the universe does call for us to search or create a term to hold this idea of &apos;a&apos; being of omnipotence that only the word &apos;god,&apos; in our lowly minds, can conjure, yet, seems to call us to relate a human quality to &apos;it.&apos; We wonder how can a being create out of nothing what it itself is not or cannot fathom? We are told from the scriptures this being wants us to relate to to it, yet only can we do so only with our emotional selves, as that is what we are. How could we relate to a creator without emotions if we are ourselves emotional beings and why would it want us to? These are rhetorical questions. - &#13;&#10;>The moment someone says &quot;God&quot;, along come the attachments: &quot;loving&quot;, &quot;omnipotent&quot;, &quot;perfect&quot;, &quot;all good&quot; etc., so &quot;God&quot; and &quot;savage&quot; sound almost like a contradiction. A savage ET doesn&apos;t sound quite so jarring. - I think people, knowingly or not, try to bring the creator God of all that is, down to a level they are able to relate so that the idea of creatures from another place no longer seems so foreign, as well as, to more or less fill in the blanks that remain. Again, we have to ask, why do these &apos;gods&apos; want to relate to us? If any of these stories did happen to any of these people in the scriptures, or to people these days (which are very similar stories), it&apos;s understandable they want to relate what has happened to them from the perspective of a &apos;god&apos; and not of some unknown alien force, or worse, their own imaginations. I cannot say these things has happened for a fact without any shadow of doubt, but many people down thru the ages &apos;believe&apos; they are having these &apos;close encounters&apos; ...whatever they are. To discount their testimonies as fiction just because we personally did not see it is akin, to my own mind, to discount anything we can&apos;t see ourselves. How can we be so sure that scientist see what they see and not what they want to see? Perspective is a lot more influence than we have realized and science proves this more everyday.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 19:08 (5623 days ago) @ dhw

part 2 - >Once we neutralize the concept (as in David&apos;s panentheism), we are free to speculate according to the evidence of the world as it is. Perhaps you yourself can think of a suitable term. - I try so very hard to only form my own opinion, or to speculate, from what I personally experience or see, and even that is not always what it seems, so I even keep what I see at arms length from influencing definite&apos;s within my mind. Because, as I think I&apos;ve said once before here, once I form a definite opinion about something, that something always changes. The terms I use to define what IS is, WHAT IS, or, UNIVERSE, and always with the idea that universe, or what IS, is a living being within itself, which I gained this perspective by my own &apos;out of body&apos; experience (which is what Dave called it). When I read the Holographic Universe, it came closest, so far, to expressing what I experienced myself. So from this point (mine), universe (we) have every quality and every emotion and every possibility that can be and so is within me as well. - &#13;&#10;> Your scenario, however, suggests two types of force: one made the universe, and one made life on Earth. This adds at least one more link to the chain, - Actually, 3 types of forces; one made the universe (a god outside the universe looking in), which I didn&apos;t suggest; and then one made life on earth, which actually, I said(or meant to say)&quot;used&quot; life on earth, combined with it&apos;s own life, to create what we have become. And then the last force, suggested above, which is that ALL is the universe itself and nothing is outside of it, and each of us is a holograph or reflection of the whole which IS. - > In your last paragraph, you write: &quot;The more we see commonality among species the more we grow feelings for them.&quot; And you express the hope that whatever created us might do the same. For all levels, human and &quot;divine&quot;, I can only echo your sentiments. As Hamlet put it: &quot;&apos;Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished.&quot; - And if all there is to fear is ourselves, hopefully one day we will come to have feelings for our most deepest and darkest inner fears so to evolve feelings for our whole selves.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Thursday, December 04, 2008, 23:02 (5629 days ago) @ dhw
edited by unknown, Thursday, December 04, 2008, 23:08

I was surprised to see my reply to this post not posted, I may have taken too long to write it, or some other glitch in the system may have happened, nevertheless, I did write a reply before I left on our holiday trip last week but it did not post, so I will try and remember what I wrote and repost. - >We are prepared endlessly to discuss the nature of an invisible, omnipotent being to which we attribute innumerable, idealized characteristics, and yet whose very existence is doubtful. But the moment people talk of other forms of life (e.g. extra-terrestrials, ghosts), they are often dismissed as cranks, sometimes even by those who believe in God. I would like to thank you for raising the subject, and to add a few thoughts of my own, with a view to opening up the discussion. (I&apos;m changing the thread title, as &quot;Catastrophes&quot; no longer seems appropriate.) - Thank you dhw for your thoughts on this subject and your willingness to &apos;go there.&apos; It is much appreciated and even makes more sense to me than to discuss a subject that can only lead in circles without end.&#13;&#10;> &#13;&#10;> 1) Clearly the existence of such beings won&apos;t help us solve the problem of origins. Instead of asking how we got here, we would have to ask how they got here. But the same question can be asked of God&apos;s origin, and in any case the forum is not confined to discussing origins.&#13;&#10;> - It may not help solve the problem of origins to discuss these other life forms (altho who knows, it might), yet it may solve many other questions we may wonder about and even possibly shed light on why we find it necessary to spend endless hours discussing an unseen God in which there cannot be any proof whatsoever. Even the scriptures claim God cannot be seen and a man live to tell about it. - > &#13;&#10;> 4) What evidence is there of such forms? None of us can possibly read all books on all subjects. Some experts have devoted themselves to studying the possibilities, and if they disagree, then they are in the same boat as the pro-God, anti-God lobbies, and we should at least consider what evidence they have to offer. (The same applies to the possibility of an afterlife.) - I agree, evidence for these other life forms as well as an afterlife should be discussed everywhere all the time as much as possible (and of course it is being discussed always), mainly because I believe it needs to move out of the taboo level and onto a more acceptable level of discussion in higher places. - But, I do not think the lobbies would be in the same boat as you say above. Pro/anti God lobbies have much less to work with than pro/anti other life form lobbies. Yet because the status of the God lobbies have moved up to acceptable discussion, even to the point of having religious universities, the &apos;other life form&apos; lobbies have remained in the bottom level as a taboo or hallucination stage with us bottom feeders (lol). I believe because the discussion of an unseen God is within an acceptable level and has been discussed to death, we have become more enlightened as a society as a whole. The reason being, many of us who were brought up in this mystical realm of religion have finally found our way out because of it&apos;s acceptable place in society. I believe in time, when these &apos;other life forms&apos; subjects are no longer taboo, and have found acceptance and true investigation is given it, on many levels, we will then move up and even move on in our enlightenment past these things as well. As long as it stays taboo and unacceptable we are ignoring the very nose on our own faces. &#13;&#10; - > 5) Who knows what technology we might have developed in, say, ten thousand years ... if we are still around? Space exploration and colonization must be a distinct possibility. If we accept that as a hypothesis, why not go back ten thousand years and imagine a planet like ours, from which beings have set forth to explore us? Maybe even colonize us? - And even another possibility, these other life forms could have been the so-called &apos;god&apos; the prophets of old saw and heard and wrote about, mistakenly believing they were the all powerful unseen God we worship and still discuss endlessly to this day. - > &#13;&#10;> what is the difference between debating God and debating other forms of life? - Maybe the difference is, one is discussing something that cannot be seen or proven yet is completely accepted in our society, and allows us to stand firmly for or against it, altho completely unknown, and we can also fight and kill endlessly for it, feeling completely justified, so this subject of an unseen God can find no end and no rest and so we can remain at a wall no one can penetrate and nothing can move or prove us wrong for standing there. The other is a discussion of something that, all tho not fully known or understood yet, possibly can be...who knows until we truly bring the subject out of the closet?

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Friday, December 05, 2008, 11:18 (5628 days ago) @ BBella

Thank you, BBella. I&apos;m just about to go away for a few days myself, so I will respond when I get back next week. This is another really interesting thread.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Tuesday, December 09, 2008, 14:23 (5624 days ago) @ BBella

I&apos;ve been away for a few days, and would like to thank David and George for giving us all these scientific facts and links in response to BBella&apos;s stimulating series of questions. I can&apos;t pretend to understand all the wikipedia &quot;alternative biochemistry&quot; possibilities, but the sheer variety is interesting in itself. Good to see David and George agreeing on the science, but perhaps I could make a couple of observations. - George to BBella: &quot;I just go by the evidence. If you can come up with evidence of such beings I&apos;m prepared to accept your hypothesis. Otherwise it is no better than fiction.&quot;&#13;&#10;Fair comment. However, here is a dictionary definition of abiogenesis.&quot;The hypothesis that life can come into being from non-living materials.&quot; There is no evidence for this hypothesis. Ergo, no better than fiction? - David to BBella: &quot;If life is present elsewhere based on our knowledge of the 92 elements, it must be carbon based as it is here.&quot;&#13;&#10;In following up the idea of &quot;other forms of life&quot;, I would be reluctant to exclude the possibilities raised much earlier by David&apos;s research into near-death and out-of-body experiences (not to mention BBella&apos;s own). It would be interesting to know what conclusions, if any, David draws from that research. - I would like to go back to a point raised by BBella&apos;s post of 4 December at 23.02, saying that this topic &quot;needs to move out of the taboo level and onto a more acceptable level of discussion in higher places&quot;. You also quite rightly point out that the status of the God lobbies has &quot;moved up to acceptable discussion, even to the point of having religious universities&quot;. - I think we need to differentiate between these &quot;higher places&quot;, and also say &quot;acceptable&quot; to whom. Billions of dollars are being spent on looking for other forms of life, through research and space probes. No taboo there. I believe there is also a Centre for UFO studies in the States, though I&apos;m not sure how &quot;acceptable&quot; that is in the eyes of the scientific community. For some scientists the idea of a god is taboo, whereas for others the sheer complexity of life suggests design, and then come all the questions about the nature of the designer(s). The drawback to your hypothesis from an explanatory point of view is that shifting the designer from a god to finite beings like ... but superior to ... ourselves only adds one more level of complexity. If chance made them, then chance could make us, but if they made us, who made them? Their defects may explain our defects, but we then need to explain their defects, which takes us back to square one. - However, that does not in any way exclude the possibility that the theory is correct. There was a whole series of books by Erich von D&#195;&#164;niken, about extraterrestrial influence on the Earth, which became worldwide best-sellers, starting with Chariots of the Gods. As far as I know, most/some of his evidence was examined and refuted by scientists, and he himself was found guilty of fraud and embezzlement, which didn&apos;t exactly help his case, but that doesn&apos;t mean the argument is over. The scientific establishment will remain sceptical unless/until there is physical evidence. The religious establishments have made up their minds already on the subject of how we got here. Talk of &quot;higher places&quot; therefore puts together conflicting sets of values, depending on people&apos;s various beliefs, and I would imagine that, for instance, the majority of western scientists would not regard madrasas as &quot;higher places&quot;. Nor would the Pope regard the Royal Society as a &quot;higher place&quot;. Their reasons for scepticism (or non-acceptability) are different, and each to some extent cancels out the other. For those of us who are not committed to either set (and I think there are plenty of us), there are no &quot;higher places&quot;, and other options remain open until we are convinced by the evidence. Perhaps, BBella, you could give us a pointer or two - relevant websites, for instance?

Other Forms of Life

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Tuesday, December 09, 2008, 15:54 (5624 days ago) @ dhw

George to BBella: &quot;I just go by the evidence. If you can come up with evidence of such beings I&apos;m prepared to accept your hypothesis. Otherwise it is no better than fiction.&quot; - dhw: &quot;Fair comment. However, here is a dictionary definition of abiogenesis.&quot;The hypothesis that life can come into being from non-living materials.&quot; There is no evidence for this hypothesis. Ergo, no better than fiction?&quot; - On the contrary. Life on Earth is known to have existed for some four billion years. Before that there is no known life, only non-living material (though that would include &apos;organic&apos; molecules, e.g. involving long chains of carbon atoms). This is evidence that life DID come from non-living materials. If not what else could it have come from? We know that all existing life forms depend on carbon-chain chemistry.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Tuesday, December 09, 2008, 21:13 (5624 days ago) @ George Jelliss
edited by unknown, Tuesday, December 09, 2008, 21:22

On the contrary. Life on Earth is known to have existed for some four billion years. Before that there is no known life, only non-living material (though that would include &apos;organic&apos; molecules, e.g. involving long chains of carbon atoms). This is evidence that life DID come from non-living materials. If not what else could it have come from? We know that all existing life forms depend on carbon-chain chemistry. - Agreed, except based on the chemistry of meteorites, only small organic molecules are found, not long chains. Some amino acids, more than 70 in the Murchison meteorite, some polyols (related to sugar), and a variety of other relatively small molecules, most interesting to me &quot;Fullerines&quot;, balls shaped from 6-carbon atom benzenes like Buckminster Fuller&apos;s geodesic domes. The users of &apos;abiogenesis&apos; prefer to say &apos;life&apos; came by chance. It also could have been directed.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Tuesday, December 09, 2008, 22:24 (5624 days ago) @ George Jelliss

George argued that without evidence BBella&apos;s hypothesis concerning extraterrestrial beings was no better than fiction. - dhw, on the subject of abiogenesis: &quot;There is no evidence for this hypothesis. Ergo, no better than fiction?&quot; - George: &quot;Life on Earth is known to have existed for some four billion years. Before that there is no known life, only non-living material (though that would include &apos;organic&apos; molecules, e.g. involving long chains of carbon atoms). This is evidence that life DID come from non-living materials. If not what else could it have come from? We know that all existing life forms depend on carbon-chain chemistry.&quot; - The argument is incontrovertible. There was no life before there was life, so what preceded life must have been non-life. But that is not what the abiogenists are out to prove, since as a statement it is too self-evident to require proof. The emphasis ... but do correct me if I&apos;m wrong ... is on the theory that the elements needed for life (and reproduction) can come together spontaneously, i.e. without any guiding intelligence. (David has just posted a similar observation.) Some dictionaries actually equate the term with &quot;spontaneous generation&quot;. That is the hypothesis for which there is no evidence. Ergo, no better than fiction?

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 00:50 (5624 days ago) @ dhw

But that is not what the abiogenists are out to prove, since as a statement it is too self-evident to require proof. The emphasis ... but do correct me if I&apos;m wrong ... is on the theory that the elements needed for life (and reproduction) can come together spontaneously, i.e. without any guiding intelligence. - There is more to the argument than that. The Urey/Miller experiment of 60 or so years ago shot an electric spark in a bottle with some inorganic compounds in liquid water and a presumed atmosphere (that was shown wrong later on), and produced some amino acids and other organic compounds that produced a tarry gunk that was somewhat self-destuctive. The amino acids that are needed for life did not appear. No one has tried to repeat this with alternative atmospheres to my knowledge, because the result was such a dead end. - The Murchison meteor is the largest one to arrive on Earth, and is very well studied. Let&apos;s make the presumption, which is pretty close to true, that the universe is really uniform in the way the 92 elements are spread out and the mechanics of star formation and explosion are also uniform. All of the parts of the meteor that broke up in the atmosphere weighed about 100 kilo. The meteor came from the asteroid belt and didn&apos;t get captured by Jupiter or Saturn as it passed by and got to us. J&S capture most of them. - The Murchison does not carry the proper amino acids necessary for life as we know it, and the ones that are necessary (if I remember, 6 out of 20) are 7% (roughly) more left-handed than right-handed, not 100% left-handed, which is required for manufacture of our kind of life. Based on the Murchison, we don&apos;t know where the amino acids required for life came from here on Earth, since we do theorize that meteors and asteroids bombarded Earth early on, and stars exploded to send all the elements, so that early Earth (before life) had whatever inorganic matter and &apos;some&apos; inappropriate organic matter present when life somehow started. After the bombardment, some organic compound manufacture had to occur on Earth before life could start spontaneously. The necessary left-handed amino acids and right-handed nucleotides (for RNA and perhaps later DNA) had to be present somehow for spontaneity to occur. - And finally, as I have explained before, organic compound manufacture of compounds necessary for life require processes with feedback loops to control the outcomes to get the right results, the right amounts of concentrations, the right shapes since carbon can make strings, loops of various sizes, etc. It is like the chicken and the egg: how do feedback loop controls get started from scratch? Some amino acids happen to bump together and react to join forces? The production of active protein molecules requie alot more than that. - My conclusion: either some very simple organic molecules got together and luckily over 6-700 million years by lots of undirected banging together, made a simple organism to start life, with stupendous odds against that eventuality, or the start of life was directed. Those are the only two possibilites: Take your choice.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Thursday, December 11, 2008, 00:01 (5623 days ago) @ dhw
edited by unknown, Thursday, December 11, 2008, 00:07

For those of us who are not committed to either set (and I think there are plenty of us), there are no &quot;higher places&quot;, and other options remain open until we are convinced by the evidence. - Thank you dhw for your reply and considerations of my wonderings. I will accept, for now, your view that &quot;there are no higher places,&quot; at least for this forum, altho I do feel this topic has yet to achieve main stream acceptance as of yet altho I believe the evidence is as plain as the noses on our faces. And, altho there are multitudes of dollars spent searching &quot;out there,&quot; I do not believe near enough is spent researching what is already taking place everyday right here on earth. - >Perhaps, BBella, you could give us a pointer or two - relevant websites, for instance? - I&apos;ve not really found any &apos;favorite&apos; website that give any special eyewitness or photographic accounts of ufo and other worldly phenomenon, other than one could research for themselves on the web, and there are many. But, in my own life experience, I do have a number of interesting accounts told to me by very extremely reliable sources as well as my own eyewitness (along with friends and family) account of some very strange, phenomenon. These accounts, coupled with so many other accounts I&apos;ve either heard or read about, even accounts down thru the ages, it just seems completely unreasonable not to at least consider these sitings and experiences as credible, as so many have experienced them for thousands of years. They cannot all be made up! Probably, if asked, everyone knows someone who has witnessed or experienced something unexplainable by modern knowledge. There may be very good logical reasons for these experiences, but until it is given serious consideration and researched scientifically, these experiences and sitings remain a mystery waiting to be uncovered.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Saturday, December 13, 2008, 09:07 (5620 days ago) @ BBella

This thread embraces a wide range of themes, and I&apos;d like to follow up on just two of BBella&apos;s observations. - Firstly, what constitutes evidence? In a court of law, we take very seriously the evidence of eyewitnesses, particularly if corroborated by other eyewitnesses. BBella argues that at least the same respect should be shown to those who claim to have witnessed events or sights that defy rational explanation. I would not confine these to UFOs. Encounters with the supernatural, communication with the dead, experiences of ESP, near-death episodes....Reports of such phenomena go back over many centuries and through all cultures. Either every single eyewitness account is a matter of delusion/ fraud/ misinterpretation etc., or there is something beyond the natural world as we know it. Science is only equipped to deal with the latter, and so science can only help us by providing natural explanations for these apparently non-natural phenomena. Unless or until it does so, dismissal can only be based on prejudice. That, of course, is not the same as saying you must believe everything you hear, but you do not call an eyewitness a fool or a liar until you have proof that he is wrong. - Secondly, there is no getting round the fact that we are far more likely to believe what we have experienced first-hand than to accept tales told by people we know nothing about. BBella writes: &quot;Probably, if asked, everyone knows someone who has witnessed or experienced something unexplainable by modern knowledge.&quot; In the Brief Guide (7. Where is it now?), I have given a very short account of a couple of strange incidents that took place in Africa ... one directly involving myself, another involving my wife. BBella, you say that you yourself have a number of interesting accounts from &quot;extremely reliable sources&quot;. You were kind enough to tell us the story of your own out-of-body experience, and although I don&apos;t want to pressurize you, I for one would be very interested to hear more. Perhaps there are also other people out there who might like to recount their experiences.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Sunday, December 14, 2008, 18:55 (5619 days ago) @ dhw

Reports of such [unexplained] phenomena go back over many centuries and through all cultures. Either every single eyewitness account is a matter of delusion/ fraud/ misinterpretation etc., or there is something beyond the natural world as we know it. Science is only equipped to deal with the latter, and so science can only help us by providing natural explanations for these apparently non-natural phenomena. Unless or until it does so, dismissal can only be based on prejudice. - If it is ok, I will answer dhw in two parts. My own experiences may take some thought to recount. - I want to add here about your first part, that altho unexplained phenomena may be a mystery to science as well as most layman, there have been many who claim to not only explain these mysteries, they understand their workings, and many are even able to harness and/or engage these &apos;so called&apos; phenomena as well. And, as has been mentioned in the guide, just because something is unknown to science does not mean it is unknown to all, or is even &quot;beyond the natural world.&quot; I do believe most scientist are correct in believing that everything has a natural explanation, even if they/we don&apos;t know what that explanation is. I would even go as far to say that &apos;everything&apos; is a natural OCCURANCE, even that which man has a hand in CAUSING TO OCCUR. - Man manipulating his surroundings, seen or unseen, for his or others benefit, seems no different to me than a chimp using a stick to get the ants he is after, or a plant calling &apos;helpers&apos; from other species to stop the destruction of itself. If there are &apos;others&apos; veiwing our existence from a more advanced society, as we view these occurances, wouldn&apos;t it be the way they would see us, just as our viewing the chimp and the stick? Man using what is available for mans own benefit? So, all things considered, isn&apos;t EVERYTHING just a natural occurance, just not everything known how it is so (to all)?

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 12:29 (5617 days ago) @ BBella

I pointed out that science can only deal with the natural world as we know it, and BBella thinks that most scientists &quot;are correct in believing that everything has a natural explanation, even if they/we don&apos;t know what that explanation is.&quot; - Perhaps we need to distinguish between &apos;natural&apos; and &apos;material&apos;, unless we&apos;re prepared to discount the possibility of a spiritual world (by saying categorically, for instance, that the brain and body are the source and not the vehicle of thought and identity). Otherwise, when we talk of the supernatural, it can be argued that we&apos;re only talking of natural phenomena we can&apos;t explain in terms of nature as we know it, and so if/when we get to know nature better, we will be able to explain them. This argument can be carried right through to God, who ... if he exists ... may be seen as synonymous with nature (pantheism). - The key expression, though, is &quot;the natural world as we know it&quot;, and in its current state, science cannot provide material explanations for certain phenomena, which leads to scepticism. I&apos;m talking about belief in UFOs, ghosts, ESP, near-death and out-of-body experiences, spiritualism, healing powers etc. They may all be part of nature; they may be delusions; they may be part of an immaterial universe beyond the scope of science. We just don&apos;t know, and until we have proof that is positive (or negative) enough to convince us as individuals, we should keep an open mind. That proof may come through experience (our own or other people&apos;s), or through science. By coincidence, an article in this week&apos;s Sunday Times magazine reports that there is to be a US and UK study of NDEs and OBEs, involving 25 hospitals and, eventually, 1500 survivors of cardiac arrests. No doubt the findings will remain open to interpretation, but at least such subjects are being taken seriously. I hope, BBella, you will find that as encouraging as I do.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:13 (5617 days ago) @ dhw

I pointed out that science can only deal with the natural world as we know it, and BBella thinks that most scientists &quot;are correct in believing that everything has a natural explanation, even if they/we don&apos;t know what that explanation is.&quot; - The above quote is only partially correct. The natural world &apos;as we know it&apos;, includes an area we cannot know but we know does exist. The underpinnings of our natural world is the &apos;phantom&apos; world of quantum uncertainty. Study it as we may, all we come with is counterintuitive findings: virtual particles pop in and out of &apos;existence&apos;; a sister particle controls the activities of its sister across the unverse, faster than the speed of light. It is a looking-glass world straight out of Lewis Carroll&apos;s brain. Scientists will never know &apos;everything&apos;, every cause and effect. And they cannot answer the question, &quot;why is there anything instead of nothing?&quot; - &#13;&#10;> The key expression, though, is &quot;the natural world as we know it&quot;, and in its current state, science cannot provide material explanations for certain phenomena, which leads to scepticism. I&apos;m talking about belief in UFOs, ghosts, ESP, near-death and out-of-body experiences, spiritualism, healing powers etc. They may all be part of nature; they may be delusions; they may be part of an immaterial universe beyond the scope of science. We just don&apos;t know, and until we have proof that is positive (or negative) enough to convince us as individuals, we should keep an open mind. - This quote also has its problems and correct statements. I am skeptical about UFO&apos;s, and suspect the US Air Force &apos;skunk works&apos; are test flying some weird airborne machines. ESP exists. My wife has the ability and has proven it to me over and over. In another post I&apos;d be happy to recite my proof. Near death and out of body experiences have been described to me by my patients. They were not delusional; delusions are part of psychosis. They are not hallucinations. Believe me, I know one when I hear one. I have had my own psychic events, just two of them, but very convincing. - ESP may have the folowing cause: The brain works with an intricate electrical network. Electricity produces electromagentism,which is how your antenna picks up radio and TV. There is no reason to deny that the brains &apos;wires&apos; can pick up and interpret radio signals, or pick up another brain&apos;s signals from its electromagnetic waves. - Healing powers are another misconception: as Docs we used the placebo effect all the time. Believe me it works. - The immaterial world is &apos;material&apos;, just not accessable to us as I discussed above. There is strong evidence for human and animal &apos;species consciousness&apos;, that is, aggregate species learning, improving intellectual activity, as well as day-to-day activity. I can quote from other authors if desired. We are not allowed to have these posts too long.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 13:40 (5616 days ago) @ David Turell

I wrote that UFOs, ghosts, ESP, near-death and out-of-body experiences, spiritualism, healing powers etc. &quot;may all be part of nature; they may be delusions; they may be part of an immaterial universe beyond the scope of science.&quot; - David says, &quot;This quote also has its problems and correct statements.&quot; - You go through the list, expressing scepticism about UFOs, certainty about ESP, conviction about NDEs and OBEs, and scepticism about healing powers, while you miss out on ghosts and spiritualism (perhaps not unconnected with NDEs and OBEs). In my post, I went on to say: &quot;...until we have proof that is positive (or negative) enough to convince us as individuals, we should keep an open mind. That proof may come through experience (our own or other people&apos;s), or through science.&quot; I would suggest that both your beliefs and your scepticism fit in with what I was trying to express. Your beliefs are conditioned by your experience, your scepticism perhaps by lack of it ... &quot;perhaps&quot; because, of course, I&apos;m in no position to say whether you are right or wrong. I&apos;ve never encountered a UFO either. - &#13;&#10;However, I have had experiences which prevent me from completely sharing your scepticism in one area. As a doctor you are convinced that healing powers are a &quot;misconception&quot;, so I will tell you of an experience that is not in the Brief Guide. My father suffered from &apos;frozen shoulder&apos;, and the doctors could not help him. Totally against his will, and in desperation,he allowed himself to be persuaded by my mother to see a faith healer who had been recommended. My father told the man right at the start that he did not believe in such things, but the gist of the healer&apos;s reply was that he and not my father was the one who had to have faith. When my parents returned to the car, my mother pointed out that my father had just raised his arm and had not cried out in pain. It took a few more sessions before he was able to regain full use of his arm, but he did so, and never had any more problems till the day he died. My account is from first hand knowledge. Of course doctors use the placebo effect, and of course it works, but this was no placebo. My father would have agreed initially with your diagnosis of healing powers as a &quot;misconception&quot;, but he certainly would not have done so after this experience. I don&apos;t wish to draw definitive conclusions from this episode, but I would still suggest that belief or scepticism in relation to all these phenomena will depend on science or on experience, though the two might not necessarily seem compatible. - Finally, I&apos;m intrigued by what you say about OBEs and NDEs, together with your statement that &quot;the immaterial world is &quot;material&quot;&apos;. If perception, identity and thought can survive independently of the brain (which is clinically dead), what is their material basis?

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Thursday, December 18, 2008, 02:33 (5616 days ago) @ dhw

However, I have had experiences which prevent me from completely sharing your scepticism in one area. As a doctor you are convinced that healing powers are a &quot;misconception&quot;, so I will tell you of an experience that is not in the Brief Guide. My father suffered from &apos;frozen shoulder&apos;, and the doctors could not help him. Totally against his will, and in desperation,he allowed himself to be persuaded by my mother to see a faith healer who had been recommended> - Let me explain your father&apos;s experience first. The proper medical treatment is to anesthetize the patient and forcibly stretch the shoulder, breaking up scar tissue around the muscles of the shoulder joint. The &apos;healer&apos; used psychology or suggestion or mild hypnosis to get your father to gradually stretch his shoulder against pain. The healing powers were within your father. Whatever was done by the healer reduced his pain so that he could stretch. - About hypnosis: Warts are caused by a virus. I know the doctor who proved this. What is amazing is despite the fact that direct medical treatment is difficult, hypnosis works, and in fact the hypnotist can ask the patient to cure the warts on his left side but not the right side and it happens! Or on the right side and not the left. The healing powers are within the patient. That is why placebos work. I once stopped giving a hospitalized patient her pain shots because it was obvious she was getting hooked. We substituted saline, which worked. Three days later I confronted her with what I did. She fired me as her MD. I didn&apos;t want her as a patient anyway, but I&apos;d made my point. - > Finally, I&apos;m intrigued by what you say about OBEs and NDEs, together with your statement that &quot;the immaterial world is &quot;material&quot;&apos;. If perception, identity and thought can survive independently of the brain (which is clinically dead), what is their material basis? - The &quot;immaterial world&quot; is the quantum layer, which underlies our reality, and it is real but not material in our ability to sense things. It is virtual energy. I&apos;m sorry that quantum theory is so counterintuitive, like Lewis Carroll in Thru the Looking Glass; it is there but not there. This is what George was suggesting as the source of our universe: a vacuum quantum fluctuation, resulting in our universe popping into existence from the virtual vacuum of our spacetime. This is the source of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Quantum mechanics makes real and accurate results with its formulas, as averages of what all the particles are doing, but has no idea where each individual particle is or whether it is a particle or wave until measured. It really is both particle and wave at the same time, all the time. We can only measure one aspect or the other. - The reason for the NDE /OOB study you have described is because of the development of hospice care for the dying. Doctors are being exposed to hearing from patients who come back from NDE&apos;s and describe friends or acquaintances that have just died and the patient could not have known this in their sedated dying condition. And those people have just died! This corroborates the episode. I&apos;ve heard a doctor in Houston describe one such story he was part of. With whom did the patient communicate during the NDE? - I believe consciousness is at the quantum level, and possibly stays as an energy constellation after death. After all TV and radio programs are electromagnetic energy (Quanta) and your set can interpret what it receives from a mass of organized quanta.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Friday, December 19, 2008, 11:45 (5614 days ago) @ David Turell

David believes in ESP, OBEs and NDEs, but not in &quot;healing powers&quot; or in an immaterial world. - No-one could seriously doubt that the mind has a huge influence on the body (and vice versa), or that placebos often work for that very reason. However, my father&apos;s frozen shoulder, which nowadays you say would be treated under anaesthetic, with the shoulder being forcibly stretched and the scar tissue being broken up, was first relieved and then cured, according to my father, by a simple placing-on of hands. In any case, the removal of warts by hypnosis is scarcely comparable. I must again stress that my father ... who was a very stubborn man ... was totally sceptical, which is not the sort of mindset conducive to autosuggestion. There can be no doubt that the healer himself, whom I met a couple of times, believed that his power came from God, and the point that remains most vividly in my memory is his response to my father&apos;s scepticism: namely, that it was he the healer who had to have faith, and not the patient. - I&apos;m fascinated by your equation of the &quot;immaterial world&quot; with the quantum layer. In OBEs and NDEs, the dead person not only retains his identity, but is also able to see and hear what is going on in the room and even elsewhere, as well as encounter other dead people. I can&apos;t see much difference between calling this perceiving identity &quot;virtual energy&quot; or an &quot;energy constellation&quot; and calling it the &quot;soul&quot; or the &quot;spirit&quot;. If you believe that this constellation does survive death, then can I presume that you also believe in ghosts and in spiritualism? I&apos;m sorry if I seem to be pushing you on this, but for me it&apos;s all part of the same complex, and I&apos;d like to know where you draw the line (and why).

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Friday, December 19, 2008, 14:14 (5614 days ago) @ dhw

No-one could seriously doubt that the mind has a huge influence on the body (and vice versa), or that placebos often work for that very reason. However, my father&apos;s frozen shoulder, which nowadays you say would be treated under anaesthetic, with the shoulder being forcibly stretched and the scar tissue being broken up, was first relieved and then cured, according to my father, by a simple placing-on of hands. In any case, the removal of warts by hypnosis is scarcely comparable. I must again stress that my father ... who was a very stubborn man ... was totally sceptical, which is not the sort of mindset conducive to autosuggestion. There can be no doubt that the healer himself, whom I met a couple of times, believed that his power came from God, and the point that remains most vividly in my memory is his response to my father&apos;s scepticism: namely, that it was he the healer who had to have faith, and not the patient. &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;I left your whole quote so I could dissect it from my viewpoint. The mind does have a huge influence, which is my point. A person lifts a car off an injured pedestrian high enough to pull him out. Yes, adrenalin underlies, but the mind drives it. My point about the warts is the amazing power of suggestion. I&apos;m like your father, and doubt I can be hypnotized, but I have identified some placebo effects in myself. If it is the healer who must have the faith in God and you saw your father&apos;s miraculous result, why don&apos;t you believe in God? You have seen His power. I believe in a greater power, but do not believe that the greater power stepped in to help your father recover. Some form of suggestion helped your father to help himself. - > I&apos;m fascinated by your equation of the &quot;immaterial world&quot; with the quantum layer. In OBEs and NDEs, the dead person not only retains his identity, but is also able to see and hear what is going on in the room and even elsewhere, as well as encounter other dead people. I can&apos;t see much difference between calling this perceiving identity &quot;virtual energy&quot; or an &quot;energy constellation&quot; and calling it the &quot;soul&quot; or the &quot;spirit&quot;. If you believe that this constellation does survive death, then can I presume that you also believe in ghosts and in spiritualism? I&apos;m sorry if I seem to be pushing you on this, but for me it&apos;s all part of the same complex, and I&apos;d like to know where you draw the line (and why). - I don&apos;t know about believing ghosts, spiritualism, or seances, but I awoke one night and saw the &apos;spectral&apos; outline of my wife dancing slowly with another woman I did not recognize shining red from the light thrown by our clock. I sat up in bed, made sure I was not sleeping, and in a short while they faded away. My wife was lying next to me sleeping quietly. As factual and scientific as I try to be, I know I saw this. My wife has documented ESP and precognition. Lets just say I am skeptical in this area. But quanta are what made the outline of my wife. Photons are quanta we see. Other quanta may become material in our reality and then disappear again. That is the other layer I am talking about. So if there are ghosts, they pop in and out of the other layer.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Saturday, December 20, 2008, 13:59 (5613 days ago) @ David Turell

David asks: &quot;If it is the healer who must have the faith in God and you saw your father&apos;s miraculous result, why don&apos;t you believe in God?&quot; - I have absolutely no doubt that humans possess at least the potential for extraordinary powers ... and my father&apos;s cure was evidence of this ... but I don&apos;t know where they come from. The healer&apos;s belief that they came from God was his, but it seems feasible to me that his faith simply enabled him to tap within himself some of the powers that lie within all of us. My difference of opinion with you is that you attribute the cure to hypnosis, or to autosuggestion, and to my father being made to use his potential ... but just as your wife may have extrasensory powers, I am suggesting (especially because of my father&apos;s scepticism) that it was the healer himself who had a special, active gift. - I like your example of the desperate man who finds the strength to lift a car off an injured pedestrian. That is the sort of potential (over a wide range of fields) that I think is in all of us, but it&apos;s more highly developed in some than in others. It&apos;s even possible that certain people have a form of ESP that enables them to make contact with the &quot;energy constellations&quot; which you believe may survive the death of the physical body. In our thread on The Arts, I posed the question of where our ideas come from. It&apos;s all the same mystery: what is the origin and nature of these astonishing powers? I don&apos;t need any kind of religious faith to believe that the healer was able to release some kind of energy to cure my father. I can accept his healing ability in just the same way as I accept the ability of a Shakespeare, a Michelangelo, a Beethoven, or your car-lifter to achieve feats far beyond the scope of an ordinary person. But like everyone else who is interested enough to log on to this website, I would like to know more! That&apos;s why other people&apos;s experiences and explanations are of immense interest and value to me, and of course it&apos;s the whole purpose of the forum.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Saturday, December 20, 2008, 19:26 (5613 days ago) @ dhw

I have absolutely no doubt that humans possess at least the potential for extraordinary powers ... and my father&apos;s cure was evidence of this ... but I don&apos;t know where they come from. just as your wife may have extrasensory powers, I am suggesting (especially because of my father&apos;s scepticism) that it was the healer himself who had a special, active gift. - Humans have extraordinary powers. Our intellect and consciousness appeared recenty in evolution, way beyond what we need to survive against nature and natural selection. The artifacts from the Neanderthals do not indicate minds of our type. There was no &apos;call&apos; for intellect of this magnitude from natural selection; the odds against chance are extraordinarily large. We do not pass quanta by the laying on of hands. We pass them through mentation and suggestion, by stirring up quanta in the other person&apos;s brain. The strength is in THAT brain.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> I like your example of the desperate man who finds the strength to lift a car off an injured pedestrian. That is the sort of potential (over a wide range of fields) that I think is in all of us, but it&apos;s more highly developed in some than in others. I don&apos;t need any kind of religious faith to believe that the healer was able to release some kind of energy to cure my father. - Yes, the healer released energy, your father&apos;s energy. It is the brain that releases adrenalin to lift the car, or endorphins to dull shoulder pain.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Monday, December 22, 2008, 08:49 (5611 days ago) @ David Turell

David and I are discussing healing and other powers. I argued that in the case of my sceptical father&apos;s frozen shoulder, the faith healer himself had a special, active gift, which enabled him &quot;to release some kind of energy to cure my father.&quot; &#13;&#10;David says that the healer released my father&apos;s energy, and the &quot;strength&quot; came from my father&apos;s brain. - I can see what you mean. Most forms of medicine work, I suppose, in conjunction with the patient&apos;s power of self-healing. But there still has to be something that passes from the outside to the inside, in this case from the healer to my father, in order to stimulate that power. I think we&apos;re talking about different stages of one process. You attribute the first stage to hypnosis and/or auto-suggestion, which would certainly be plausible in many situations and with many people, but you didn&apos;t know my father! I would still argue that the first stage suggests a remarkable and mysterious gift, in so far as one man with no outside aid could stimulate another man&apos;s brain into producing ... with immediate effect ... the necessary endorphins, when the other man had no faith in him and when medical science had proved completely ineffective over many painful months. Sorry, but I appear to have inherited a streak of my father&apos;s stubbornness! - Thank you for telling us about your own experiences of ESP, and particularly your wife&apos;s amazing ability to locate lost objects. I have no explanation, but I do wish she would pass her secret over to me, especially on a Monday morning.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Monday, December 22, 2008, 15:07 (5611 days ago) @ dhw

[/i]David says that the healer released my father&apos;s energy, and the &quot;strength&quot; came from my father&apos;s brain.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;> I can see what you mean. Most forms of medicine work, I suppose, in conjunction with the patient&apos;s power of self-healing. But there still has to be something that passes from the outside to the inside, in this case from the healer to my father, in order to stimulate that power. Sorry, but I appear to have inherited a streak of my father&apos;s stubbornness! - I&apos;m just as stubborn. Your father&apos;s innate healing powers were stimulated by the &apos;healer&apos;. But how? By a passage of quanta thru the skin? They can pass through solid walls. I still say, if you believe in this type of psychic magic from the healer&apos;s faith, it&apos;s not much of a jump to accept a deity. I realize bone fide medical attempts failed. What inappropriate method did they try? I&apos;ve seen lots of awful medical practice. The surgery I described, I believe, was available then. Let&apos;s not used the failed medicine as a comparison. I agree with the following: the healer directly influenced your father to use HIS own powers.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Sunday, December 21, 2008, 01:31 (5613 days ago) @ dhw

It&apos;s even possible that certain people have a form of ESP that enables them to make contact with the &quot;energy constellations&quot; which you believe may survive the death of the physical body. In our thread on The Arts, I posed the question of where our ideas come from. It&apos;s all the same mystery: what is the origin and nature of these astonishing powers? But like everyone else who is interested enough to log on to this website, I would like to know more! That&apos;s why other people&apos;s experiences and explanations are of immense interest and value to me, and of course it&apos;s the whole purpose of the forum. - I&apos;ve had one startling ESP event: I was driving home from a day at the clinic, idly listening to a talk radio program with rambling comments about Houston heat and sunburn. As I stopped at a redlight ( and I know exactly where to this day 20+ years later), the lady on the phone said she a a great sunburn treatment. The host had to take a commercial break, and she was put on hold. Into my head popped: soak a T-shirt on stong tea and put it on the person with the bad sunburn. Remember that what I was hearing has a 10-20 second delay to screen out obvious things that should not go over the air. When she resumed, that is exactly what she had said. I had not thought of or heard of that method before, but tea is a tanning agent and a reasonable suggestion. - How did I get the message? All electric wires broadcast electromagnetic waves. That is how radio and TV send out signals. Did my brain wires pick up her message as they were sent over phone wries to the radio station? That is my theory. - One day my wife said she had just &apos;seen&apos; (she meant in her brain) that a building &apos;climber&apos; in Houston had just jumped off a tall building, purposely jumping backwards from a corner high up on the outside of the building. I rushed to the TV and described to her what was being reported, as I saw the man leap away, and that is exactly how she &apos;saw&apos; it. Did she pick up a TV transmission? Or did she &apos;see it&apos;? When I lose something, I ask her what it is on. She will usually be able to tell me color or pattern. I was looking for a halter in the barn I couldn&apos;t find. She told me it was on brown plaid. I went to the tack room, lifted up a saddle blanket from a stack, where the edge of a brown plain saddle blanket could be seen underneath. There was the hidden halter. I have no idea how that works. Does anyone?

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Sunday, December 21, 2008, 23:12 (5612 days ago) @ dhw

You were kind enough to tell us the story of your own out-of-body experience, and although I don&apos;t want to pressurize you, I for one would be very interested to hear more. Perhaps there are also other people out there who might like to recount their experiences. - Thank you dhw for you patience...I have taken the time and chosen from the many experiences my family and I have had and put them in two parts. - This first post is my experiences and the second will be my family&apos;s experiences. I will try and recount them according to a time line to the best of my remembrance.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;1. My earliest experience with anything considered unexplained or paranormal (outside of myself, explained in #4) happened one night in the early 70&apos;s when I was around 17. I awakened startled from a sound sleep with the feeling of a presence in the room. I turned to look beside my bed and I saw a very dark tall figure standing beside my bed seeming to be slightly bent down over me. The figure was illuminated by the moonlight coming thru the window behind it. I immediately turned on the light and there was no one there and nothing to explain the dark figure as my door and windows in the room were all locked.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;2. In the mid 80&apos;s I was walking my younger brother ( about 18) out onto the deck of my house to say goodnight just after mid-night and, as we were talking, I looked up to admire the beautiful clear night sky, and almost directly above my head there was, what appeared to be, stars moving very slowly in a straight line from east to west. There had to be many hundreds if not thousands as they were as far as the eye could see from east to west ( I live in the deep woods in the foothills surrounded by pines and large trees on top of a hill, so couldn&apos;t see either horizons). The &quot;stars&quot; moved with no sound and were about the size of small, not tiny, stars. We watched for about 15 min or so until my bro decided to go ahead and leave. He said he thought they were probably something to do with the military. But, to this day, I still wonder why we didn&apos;t both wait longer to see if the line ended and, wonder too, why we weren&apos;t more curious about such a phenomenon? I don&apos;t even think we had ever told anyone till years later. I can&apos;t even imagine how the military could be that far up with that many flying vehicles that close together with no sound in absolute perfect formation as if someone had drawn dot to dots across the sky. &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;3. When I became very ill in the late 90&apos;s early 00&apos;s, I would often wake up hearing and seeing (from the glow of the moonlight) someone open the door and come in my room or someone standing beside me, but there was never anyone there when I would turn the light on or call out to them. This seemed to happen several times a month at least. I was on no meds or sleeping pills, as nothing given me could take even the slightest amount of pain away and, I&apos;ve rarely ever had any problems sleeping altho I&apos;ve always been a light sleeper. But, one night, I awoke to a presence in the room and looked and saw a tall being standing at the foot of my bed. It was dressed in gold armor from head to toe which was made up of small square plates and some seemed to have writings or symbols on them, altho I&apos;m not sure, could have been indention&apos;s. Altho there was no light in the room at all, I could see it as plainly as if the room was lit. It also had a helmet/headdress and a staff and just stood there not moving or say anything, altho, the gold did seem to shimmer as if it were reflecting moving light. The room was pitch dark as no moon was out that night. When I turned on the light it wasn&apos;t there. I immediately wrote down what I had seen so I could remember it vividly the next day. When I finally turned off the light, I again noticed it was pitch black in the room. None of these things have happened since and it wasn&apos;t too long after this that I had the vision that gave me relief of my pain.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;More on next post.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Sunday, December 21, 2008, 23:14 (5612 days ago) @ BBella

Personal experiences continued: - 5. Our family has a lot of paranormal happenings, especially to two of our family members who claim they can &quot;see&quot; those who have passed, or ghost. Many of our family are physic and know it, and many are, but refuse to acknowledge it, because of their beliefs. I believe psychic ability (however it manifests) is just one part of our overall inherited quality of being which, everyone uses everyday without realizing it and, if exercised, just like any muscle, can grow even more keen. I personally, since very young, have always felt the &quot;presence&quot; of those that cannot be seen but have always had such fear when I had these feelings, I would almost go into panic attacks because of it. Since my illness, I know not to fear the feeling and just observe what/who comes to mind and let it go. - One other thing I wanted to mention is, all my life, since I was a very young child, I would dream things that would eventually happen. I have dreamed of births as well as deaths and other events. My family has rarely experienced deaths, but when we did, I would dream of the deaths in advance. One night, in a dream, I was asked if I wanted to continue to have this ability, and I said no, that I didn&apos;t like knowing ahead of time about the deaths of loved ones. I have not had these dreams since and several loved ones have died since. I have also had dreams of major catastrophes thru out my life as well. It was during my illness that I was asked whether I wanted to continue to have this ability. - Since the vision of the golden being at the foot of my bed, my &apos;abilities&apos; have taken a completely different turn. I no longer sense things or dream things as I did...but, I now have the ability to disperse energy blockages (from past blocked/suppressed emotions) within myself which continues to help me heal and relieves pain instantly. I&apos;ve also taught others to do the same and have had witnessed many excellent results. This ability may be documented or written about somewhere by someone, but, it is new to me and those I have helped (friends and family). This ability has grown from my research on the power of my own mind which began the day of my experience I recounted, I called my NDE, but David Turell called an OBE. Whatever it was, it redirected my mind from outside myself to my own uncharted frontier, my own mind, which has greatly served me since. - If anyone has any idea or more information on any of these experiences, I would be open minded and greatly appreciative to hear what others may know or think. I would even hope that a new thread could be made just for everyone&apos;s own experiences of the paranormal.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Sunday, December 21, 2008, 23:37 (5612 days ago) @ BBella

Family experiences: &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;1. In the early 90&apos;s, my older brother and his wife were over visiting as he had just moved up from the south. My younger brother (above) was over as well, and as we visited, my younger brother decided to tell the same story above to my older brother, as we were talking about an unusual happening my dad had experienced (which I cannot remember the details right now, but will ask him) which my dad had related to my older bro earlier in the day, and wanted to know if we had heard it as well. This devolved into talking about unusual experiences and so, he and his wife told us a story that they both had never told anyone before this night: Before they were married (many years before this), he was about 17, they were parking in his car after dark and were both in the back seat. When he looked up in the back glass he saw a bright white light which, at first, he thought was a very bright star. As he watched it appeared to be growing brighter and coming closer. He told his girlfriend (now wife) to look and when she looked, without his prompting, she said it was coming closer and so they both agreed they should get the bleep out of there! They both got out of the car, heard no noise, and watched to make sure and, as they watched, it definitely looked to be drawing nearer, even to the tops of the trees, but with no noise. They were just a 1/4 mile or so from my parents home and so got in the car and drove as fast as they could toward our house. And as they watched behind them, it appeared to follow them all the way to my parents house and continued to get closer so much so they thought it was going to come right down where they were, and still no noise! Then, right before they got to the house, both of them saw it shot away at a pace that was unbelievable and disappeared into the sky. My brother said, being so young back then (17), he actually thought it might have been God or an angel trying to scare them since they were doing something they shouldn&apos;t.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;2. In the mid 90&apos;s, I was talking to my younger brother late one night on his cell phone. He was driving a large U-Haul truck, and as we were talking, he began to exclaim some obscenities excitedly! I asked what was going on, and he related to me that he was seeing a large dark triangular flying vehicle (shaped similar to a paper airplane) of some sort that was flying as fast as he was driving not 30 or more feet from him out in a treeless pasture directly beside him. He said a light or lights (can&apos;t remember exactly) was reflecting onto the ground beneath it, so it was very close to the ground and, it was keeping up with his speed, as if it was trying to keep up with him. That happened for about a very few moments and then it shot away. He stopped on the side of the road and other people were stopping as well, and they all watched it for a bit out and around the pasture, not exactly sure how long, and then it just shot away and everyone got back in their vehicles and left. My brother was talking to me the whole time.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;Continued in next post.

Other Forms of Life

by BBella @, Sunday, December 21, 2008, 23:39 (5612 days ago) @ BBella

Family experiences continued: - 3. My niece, who is known to be very psychic, but, because of her mothers (my older sister) fundamental belief that anything to do with this kind of thing is demonic, she kept a very low profile and rarely spoke of these things other than to those more open minded in the family. One day, around the mid 90&apos;s, around dusk, she and her sis-n-law were driving to her sister-n-laws mothers home. As they were driving, there appeared a cloud like fog directly in front of them. It was not very big and kind of oval in shape, but without perfect edges and seemed to be quite dense. The windows were rolled down and they thought at first it might be a puff of smoke from somewhere, but there was no smell at all. About 4-5 minutes later my niece (around 27 at the time) said a woman just spoke to her and gave her name and told my niece to tell her (the woman that spoke) sister that she was very happy and well. Because the name sounded unfamiliar they asked the sister-n-laws mother if she had heard the name before, and she hadn&apos;t. A few weeks later my niece called to tell me that her sister-n-law, after the name kept bugging her, decided to look up the name in the phone book and found a similar last name that lived on the very road they had been driving down that day. Because it was so coincidental they called this person, and the woman who picked up said that the other name was her sister that had died sometime before and that she was still in much grief from losing her. She was very appreciative of the message given her from my niece and said she was comforted by it. This is just one incident of many that my niece experienced during that time. This was a time that so many of those &apos;passed&apos; had began to awaken her during the night and give her messages that my niece had decided to close her &apos;ability&apos; down as those who were passed were not allowing her any &apos;down&apos; time. She since is only open to dealing with animals because she feels their &apos;energy&apos; is more respectful. - There are also several OBE and NDE&apos;s and other different type of phenomena that my family members have had as well. For one, I would have to call them and get the exact details so to get them as close to the truth as possible. The one&apos;s I have chosen are the one&apos;s I have the best memory at this time about. It would prob take a whole book for me to recount all of the stories I have heard, just from my family alone as I&apos;ve got an unusually ENORMOUS family! The &apos;Smith&apos;s&apos; are known to be prolific!

Other Forms of Life

by DragonsHeart @, Friday, September 16, 2011, 17:30 (4613 days ago) @ BBella

BBella,-I am so thankful that you posted these experiences, even if I am a few years behind in reading them(I only joined this site a few months ago). I have a few experiences of my own that people don&apos;t understand, or just won&apos;t believe.-1. When I was 16, a friend of mine was shot and killed. Nearly 18 months later, after I graduated high school and was preparing to enter college, I had an extremely vivid dream(for lack of a better term). I was sitting in my 12th grade English classroom. My friend walked in and spoke directly to me, saying &quot;I&apos;m okay. You don&apos;t have to worry about me anymore.&quot; I remember waking up right after that with a sense of peace that I had not known until that point.-2. I somehow just know if a pregnant woman is having a boy or a girl. The woman has to have some connection to me, even if remote. One time, a relative of a friend of my sister&apos;s was having a baby, and started having complications. My sister called me and wanted to know if the baby was a boy or a girl(the mother-to-be had not had a chance to find out yet). I could feel the connection, but didn&apos;t want to tell my sister what I felt. The baby was a girl, but wasn&apos;t going to make it. I later found out that the baby girl did pass away a few hours after her extremely premature birth.-3. My significant other&apos;s grandmother was diagnosed with cancer over the summer. We got a call on a Monday that she had taken a drastic turn for the worse, and probably would not live out the week. I had a dream on Thursday night/Friday morning that my SO and I were in our living room when my phone rang. It was his grandmother(I had talked to her on the phone several times, but never met her in person), and she identified herself and asked to speak to my SO. She told him how proud she was of him and how much she loved him. We got the call on Saturday evening that she passed away very early Friday morning.-I have never been bothered by these occurrences. In many ways I am glad for them. They are not really close together. I can also feel what others are feeling. I don&apos;t mean sympathy or even what most people call empathy. I think it&apos;s what Mercedes Lackey calls Empathy(capital &quot;E&quot; is necessary). -Thank you again, BBella, for sharing your experiences, and thank you to everyone else for allowing me to share mine.

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Friday, September 16, 2011, 18:33 (4613 days ago) @ DragonsHeart

&#13;&#10;> I am so thankful that you posted these experiences, even if I am a few years behind in reading them(I only joined this site a few months ago). I have a few experiences of my own that people don&apos;t understand, or just won&apos;t believe.-&#13;&#10;> Thank you again, BBella, for sharing your experiences, and thank you to everyone else for allowing me to share mine.-My wife is just like you. I have described a number of experiences she has had, including dreams, and also events aa few minutes later shown on TV as fresh news. I am convinced these are real psychic episodes, and, as Sheldrake has shown in his experiments that some of us can communicate at a different reality level.(See, &quot;A Glorious Accident&quot;, by Wim Keyzer, 1997, especially the discussion of crossword puzzels.)) I believe there is a human species consciousness, and this is how information is delivered in NDE&apos;s. Please don&apos;t feel funny about it; my wife does to some degree. I think of you as part of a normal sub-group of human beings, and I think you are lucky to have that ability.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Saturday, September 17, 2011, 09:11 (4612 days ago) @ DragonsHeart

DragonsHeart has kindly told us about certain dreams and experiences which tie in with accounts given to us by BBella and David, and which &quot;people don&apos;t understand, or just won&apos;t believe.&quot;-Not believing you is an insult to your integrity, but not understanding is a different matter. Like BBella and some of her family, you seem to have a psychic sensitivity, and I wonder if you understand it yourself. Two of the episodes are dreams that provide the sort of comfort reported by some patients who survived a NDE, but the baby incident goes a step further because ... again as in some NDEs ... it entails your acquiring verifiable information that would not have been available to you under normal circumstances. I find such experiences particularly interesting. David attributes them to a &quot;human species consciousness&quot;, and it would be interesting to know your own explanation.-The basic question is whether or not our mind and identity are totally dependent on our physical brain. Psychic experiences suggest that they are not. You will know all too well that there&apos;s a lot of scepticism about these, but until we&apos;ve unravelled the mysteries of the conscious and unconscious mind ... if we ever do ... I for one remain open-minded about the possible implications. -It takes courage to share such experiences with strangers, and I really appreciate your having done so. Thank you.

Other Forms of Life

by dhw, Monday, March 15, 2010, 17:32 (5163 days ago) @ dhw

There is a fascinating article by Paul Davies in today&apos;s Guardian, concerning the search for alien life. It&apos;s too long to quote in full, and I can&apos;t find a link, so I will quote the most salient section:-&quot;The problem is that even the simplest living thing is already so stupendously complex that if such an entity were to be thrown together by chance, it would be a fluke of such magnitude as to be unlikely to happen twice in the observable universe, vast though that may be.-However, we don&apos;t know that life&apos;s origin was purely a chemical accident. Scientists are aware of all manner of self-organising processes that might have fast-tracked mindless molecules down a path of complexification leading to life. Indeed, that is the fashionable view. The biologist Christian de Duve expresses it splendidly with the evocative slogan that &quot;life is a cosmic imperative&quot;.&#13;&#10; &#13;&#10;Unfortunately, there are few grounds for this new-found optimism. Scientists have no agreed theory of the origin of life ... plenty of scenarios, conjectures and just-so stories, but nothing with solid experimental support. Life may emerge from unremarkable chemical sludge with a high degree of probability; but then again, it may not. We haven&apos;t a clue either way. And while we are completely in the dark about precisely what it takes for life to start up, putting an estimate on the numbers of alien civilizations is pointless.-There might be a way to solve this problem at a stroke. No planet is more earth-like than Earth itself, so if life really does pop up readily in earth-like conditions, then surely it should have arisen many times right here on our home planet? And how do we know it didn&apos;t? The truth is, nobody has looked.&quot;-He goes on to say that a few scientists are now actively looking for forms of life on Earth that are different from those we know. If such forms were found, they would indicate a second genesis, and this in turn would make it &quot;fairly certain&quot; that there is life elsewhere. &quot;And once life gets going, there is at least a chance that intelligence will evolve.&quot;-If other forms of life are found, proponents of design can still argue that God would not have confined himself to a single experiment; if other forms are not found, proponents of chance can still argue that we should keep looking, or that this uniqueness shows just how incredibly lucky we are. All the same, the discovery of other forms would add a new dimension to the discussion. Until then, the fact that &quot;we haven&apos;t a clue&quot; serves only to highlight the degree of faith required by those who think they do have a clue.-*** Postscript: you can find the full article and comments on&#13;&#10;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/mar/14/life-aliens-planet-second-genesis

Other Forms of Life

by David Turell @, Monday, March 15, 2010, 21:36 (5163 days ago) @ dhw

There is a fascinating article by Paul Davies in today&apos;s Guardian, concerning the search for alien life. It&apos;s too long to quote in full, and I can&apos;t find a link, so I will quote the most salient section:&#13;&#10;> &#13;&#10;> &quot;The problem is that even the simplest living thing is already so stupendously complex that if such an entity were to be thrown together by chance, it would be a fluke of such magnitude as to be unlikely to happen twice in the observable universe, vast though that may be.-&#13;&#10;The recent article on DNA repair gives a glimpse into this &quot;stupendous complexity&quot;:-&#13;&#10;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100311123522.htm

RSS Feed of thread
powered by my little forum