<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Mathematical Model for how Social Groups Split</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Mathematical Model for how Social Groups Split (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan11/factions.html&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;">http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan11/factions.html&amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt;</a> &amp;#13;&amp;#10;&gt; When we were forming our clinic, I looked at research papers on group formation. Doctors have huge egos and this is what was reported: up to five indiviuals will work well. The 5-14 area of growth is the most problematic. Egos really start to play a role,but above 14-15, egos are deluted out and the group survives. Our group get to 10 and fell apart. Some of us remained together, but never more than four. When I retired, my partner pulled in others whose groups had fallen apart, but he rented to them, held the reins, and now there are six working together with the benefits of a partnership, but he is the owner, and each earns his own income. It is interesting that group dynamics have yielded to math!-Yeah, tell me about it...</p>
</blockquote></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5580</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5580</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mathematical Model for how Social Groups Split (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan11/factions.html-When">http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan11/factions.html-When</a> we were forming our clinic, I looked at research papers on group formation. Doctors have huge egos and this is what was reported: up to five indiviuals will work well. The 5-14 area of growth is the most problematic. Egos really start to play a role,but above 14-15, egos are deluted out and the group survives. Our group get to 10 and fell apart. Some of us remained together, but never more than four. When I retired, my partner pulled in others whose groups had fallen apart, but he rented to them, held the reins, and now there are six working together with the benefits of a partnership, but he is the owner, and each earns his own income. It is interesting that group dynamics have yielded to math!</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5576</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5576</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>David Turell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mathematical Model for how Social Groups Split</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan11/factions.html">http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan11/factions.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5573</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=5573</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
