<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>AgnosticWeb.com - Summer Reading:  Epistemology</title>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/</link>
<description>An Agnostic&#039;s Brief Guide to the Universe</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Summer Reading:  Epistemology</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the length of the link, but I&amp;apos;ll be borrowing this book from the library for this summer&amp;apos;s reading:-http://catalog.lib.unomaha.edu/search~S0?/X%28Problems%20of%20Knowledge%29&amp;SORT=D/X%28Problems%20of%20Knowledge%29&amp;SORT=D&amp;SUBKEY=%28Problems%20of%20Knowledge%29/1%2C186%2C186%2CB/frameset&amp;FF=X%28Problems%20of%20Knowledge%29&amp;SORT=D&amp;1%2C1%2C-As epistemology categorically encompasses what I view to be the real root of this debate, I think that this would be recommended reading for all parties involved, as it will allow us to clearly delineate the true roots of our differences, which--as I have oft repeated--purely a matter of raw interpretation based upon our (ultimately) deterministic philosophies rather than truly concrete positions.  -The book traces the development of skepticism as it pertains to Western epistemology and finally, argues for a philosophical treatment of contextualism as a basis for a system of knowledge-gathering as it isn&amp;apos;t dislodged by skepticism.  (My main reason for wanting to read it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=3496</link>
<guid>https://agnosticweb.com/index.php?id=3496</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
<category>Humans</category><dc:creator>xeno6696</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
