Random events + selection beats human tuners... (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Friday, March 30, 2012, 22:24 (4620 days ago) @ dhw

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27673/
> 
> MATT: A potshot @ David of course! 
> 
> Ugh, ugh, these headline writers!
> 
> Quote: "Haye Hinrichsen proposes a solution [...] that may make it possible for electronic tuners to match the performance of the best human tuners."
> 
> And Hinrichsen's algorithm, as compared to professional tuners, "doesn't come off badly at all."
> 
> If that = BEATS human tuners, we are dancing to a different beat!-I read the paper. The theory is rock-solid, all that's needed now is to tweak that algorithm. -It's done, son.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"