Science and Language (The limitations of science)
An interesting piece in the latest "Workshop" issued by the Society for Interdisciplinary Studies summarizes various articles from New Scientist about evolution. We don't need a designer because chaos organizes itself so that evolution will progress? It's a great way to win your argument: just state what you believe as if it's a fact, and don't bother about evidence. Isn't that what atheists usually accuse theists of doing?-Now you know what I go through. I've been offering you on this site New Scintist articles right along. They are ok in general, but many are sloppy defenses against theism.
Complete thread:
- Science and Language -
dhw,
2012-03-05, 20:08
- Science and Language -
David Turell,
2012-03-05, 22:16
- Science and Language - David Turell, 2012-03-09, 14:53
- Science and Language -
David Turell,
2012-03-05, 22:16