For David: History of Panentheism (Introduction)
by xeno6696 
, Sonoran Desert, Saturday, February 04, 2012, 20:53 (4677 days ago)
http://www.amazon.com/Panentheism-Other-Philosophers-Plato-Present/dp/0801027241/ref=cm...
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
For David: History of Panentheism
by David Turell , Tuesday, February 07, 2012, 15:58 (4674 days ago) @ xeno6696
http://www.amazon.com/Panentheism-Other-Philosophers-Plato-Present/dp/0801027241/ref=cm... I knew about this book, had not read it, and with its Christian perspective was not interested.
For David: History of Panentheism
by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, February 08, 2012, 12:14 (4673 days ago) @ David Turell
http://www.amazon.com/Panentheism-Other-Philosophers-Plato-Present/dp/0801027241/ref=cm... > Thanks. I knew about this book, had not read it, and with its Christian perspective was not interested.-Reading the reviews, the author's case is very short, and made at the end of the book. And remember, in the end, all 3 Abrahamic faiths view anything other than "completely transcendental" as false. That part should hardly be suprising...
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
For David: History of Panentheism
by David Turell , Thursday, February 09, 2012, 15:09 (4672 days ago) @ xeno6696
http://www.amazon.com/Panentheism-Other-Philosophers-Plato-Present/dp/0801027241/ref=cm... > Reading the reviews, the author's case is very short, and made at the end of the book. And remember, in the end, all 3 Abrahamic faiths view anything other than "completely transcendental" as false. That part should hardly be suprising...-Thanks again. Not interested. I know the proselytizing is at the end,but how much bias is in his thought pattern?