Sci Am\'s Complexity with Darwinism (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 18:27 (4672 days ago)

Lots of fluff. Just quote another scientist's fluffly conjecture and the appearance of eyes must be easy. Cambrian eyes have no precursors, so how is is step-wise possible 1% at a time, as the article proposes:

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/2012/01/16/evolution-the-rise-of-comp...