The story, in brief. (Introduction)
Thanks for ignoring the question entirely. Useful that.-The issue at hand from our last entry:-> > Trying to get a better grasp of your positions. I'm going to assume you have either read Dawkins's 'The Selfish Gene' or have access to a library. What is it about the process outlined in the second chapter (The replicators) that you find implausible? > > I've read The God Delusion. Shapiro is bypassing Dawkins, the reason why the Altenberg 16 met two years ago. Neo-Darwinism is on its last legs. To my mind Dawkins is bombastic old hat. Shapiro is the future.-I couldn't be more clear. I haven't read that book or chapter. Summarize it and I'll answer. My previous entry tells you my position from the current science literature. I suggest you become acquainted with it. Remember, I believe in evolution, but the old DArwin explanations and the new ones (which are shoe-horned into the old concepts) are flat out wrong when compared to the current findings.-It is apparent to me that first life forms had most of the genetic mechanisms we see now. How it started that way is totally unknown. My guess is a UI. What is yours?
Complete thread:
- The story, in brief. -
broken_cynic,
2011-09-05, 23:35
- The story, in brief. -
David Turell,
2011-09-06, 02:38
- The story, in brief. -
broken_cynic,
2011-09-21, 21:15
- The story, in brief. -
David Turell,
2011-09-21, 21:39
- The story, in brief. -
xeno6696,
2011-11-28, 01:35
- The story, in brief. -
David Turell,
2011-11-28, 02:03
- The story, in brief. -
xeno6696,
2011-11-28, 03:00
- The story, in brief. - David Turell, 2011-11-28, 05:23
- The story, in brief. -
xeno6696,
2011-11-28, 03:00
- The story, in brief. -
David Turell,
2011-11-28, 02:03
- The story, in brief. -
xeno6696,
2011-11-28, 01:35
- The story, in brief. -
David Turell,
2011-09-21, 21:39
- The story, in brief. -
broken_cynic,
2011-09-21, 21:15
- The story, in brief. -
David Turell,
2011-09-06, 02:38