Skewering James Shapiro (Introduction)

by broken_cynic , Tuesday, August 09, 2011, 23:57 (4833 days ago) @ David Turell

I wish I could get into this book. His scientific-You haven't read the book, but you're ready to judge that his findings are scientific (insinuating that the perspective of the reviewer is not.) Do you have any basis for this beyond liking the cut of Shapiro's jib? -> findings are reviewed and frighten -Citation needed.-> the Darwinist reviewer-Definition needed. -> for turning Darwin theory topsy-turvy:
 
Darwin theory? Is that supposed to be synonymous with existing theory of evolution or in contrast to? Never mind the part where you somehow know that a book you haven't read upsets a theory you don't like.