Studying Negative Computer Models (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Monday, August 01, 2011, 14:08 (4862 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Tony,-I'm assuming you weren't following the part of the thread this popped up in.-If this is not true, ignore the rest of this post.-The mathematics used are the mathematics used to predict the Big Bang and have been confirmed by thw WMAP data. So the math isn't a flight of fancy. David and I oppose the anthropic principle for different reasons. My opposition is that it restricts research to studying only a universe like ours, David's is that it ignores critical questions that suggest a creator. -But the overriding point is that if there is a flaw in studying aberrant universes because of the math, then that math is flawed for ALL models, not just those special cases under consideration. You can't discount a negative study but still accept the math that created your positive result. Those negative cases should provide information that can improve your model, and in the case of the standard model, might reconcile classical & quantum physics without using fairy theories (like strings.).

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"