The odds for God (Introduction)
> It's not just a math point of view--you've referred to this a couple times in similar cycles. If I characterize you properly, you refer to the "math point of view" as that closed system that deals only in proofs, cold, stark, and pure logic? -I don't know or understand math like you do. All I know is as you describe above. > > My point is deeper than that. If you want to be able to compute the odds of any event, you need to have more information than "it's happened once." -But if you know the requirements to put together DNA and/or RNA, and we do know their structure, what are the odds of it happening by chance. Can't that be computed?- > > As for your fine tuning comment; great way to look at it. But I take a reverse view of your point. -> You didn't address my main thrust however--that two equally logical claims coming from the same evidence simply points to the lack of a solution. (Here's where the more traditional "math side" enters...)-I understand that. But about my point above.... Can we calculate the chance for DNA?
Complete thread:
- The odds for God -
David Turell,
2011-05-07, 19:23
- The odds for God: where is Matt\'s reply? - David Turell, 2011-05-16, 01:11
- The odds for God -
xeno6696,
2011-05-20, 22:41
- The odds for God -
David Turell,
2011-05-20, 23:54
- The odds for God -
xeno6696,
2011-05-21, 00:15
- The odds for God -
David Turell,
2011-05-21, 01:40
- The odds for God - xeno6696, 2011-05-21, 04:56
- The odds for God -
David Turell,
2011-05-21, 01:40
- The odds for God -
xeno6696,
2011-05-21, 00:15
- The odds for God -
David Turell,
2011-05-20, 23:54