Can anyone here defend Darwinism? (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Friday, December 31, 2010, 21:04 (5053 days ago) @ David Turell

This comment is right on. The Darwin theory is so full of holes it is worse than swiss cheese. That doesn't mean that intelligent design is correct. So what do you accept as a reasonable theory? Evolution occured, but how?
> 
> http://www.uncommondescent.com/-
Like I said before, however much you hate it, as of 12/31/2010 there is not a better theory in existence. Even when epigenetics takes a more prominent role, as I argued (and you agreed) Natural selection will still be the cause for whatever remains.-Epigenetic mechanisms still do not make a deity more likely: without a causal mechanism, there is no explanatory God. -I haven't said it so adroitly before, but you're chasing ghosts here... the new results coming from the biology sumit is not going to shake the ground nearly as much as you think...-Arguments for an atheistic view don't rely on evolution being passive, but that no mechanism has been devised that adequately explains how God makes these changes.-Until there is a body of evidence that suggests that organismal evolution occurs without a corresponding environmental cause... there is no case for an ID position that relies on material evidence.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"