What science does not do (Agnosticism)
by xeno6696 
, Sonoran Desert, Monday, December 20, 2010, 11:44 (5087 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained
I fail to see how my practice of solving a combinatorial equation has any bearing at all on ethics or morality... so I can't buy the idea that 'all endeavors try to answer the same question.' -The same for functional analysis or number theory.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Complete thread:
- What science does not do -
romansh,
2010-12-18, 16:53
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- What science does not do -
Balance_Maintained,
2010-12-18, 17:50
- What science does not do - George Jelliss, 2010-12-18, 19:29
- What science does not do -
xeno6696,
2010-12-20, 11:44
- What science does not do - Balance_Maintained, 2010-12-20, 13:21
- What science does not do -
xeno6696,
2010-12-20, 14:55
- What science does not do - Balance_Maintained, 2010-12-21, 06:43
- What science does not do - David Turell, 2010-12-18, 20:53
- What science does not do -
xeno6696,
2010-12-20, 11:37
- What science does not do -
romansh,
2010-12-21, 02:59
- What science does not do - xeno6696, 2010-12-21, 04:55
- What science does not do -
romansh,
2010-12-21, 02:59
- What science does not do -
Balance_Maintained,
2010-12-18, 17:50