Another slam at peer review (Introduction)
by David Turell 
, Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 15:07 (5069 days ago)
From Slate: a review of its history (about 25 years old) with good negative observations:-http://www.slate.com/id/2116244/
kuchnie warszawa
by kwtrineeefforne 
, Cyprus, Saturday, December 18, 2010, 20:41 (5066 days ago) @ David Turell
Hello, finally registered after 6 months of reading!- <a href=http://kuchniewarszawa.waw.pl>kuchnie warszawa</a>
kuchnie warszawa
by David Turell , Saturday, December 18, 2010, 21:02 (5066 days ago) @ kwtrineeefforne
Hello, finally registered after 6 months of reading! > > > <a href=http://kuchniewarszawa.waw.pl>kuchnie warszawa</a>-Welcome, and join in!
Another slam at peer review
by David Turell , Saturday, January 08, 2011, 02:26 (5046 days ago) @ David Turell
Another slam at peer review. Scientific fraud:-There was an article published online by CNN highlighting the finding by the British journal, BMJ, that Dr. Andrew Wakefield's sensational study linking autism to childhood vaccinations was a "complete fraud".
Another slam at peer review
by George Jelliss , Crewe, Monday, September 05, 2011, 23:46 (4805 days ago) @ David Turell
This article by David Colquhoun (and another by George Monbiot) have stirred up quite a storm about peer review and the academic journal business in The Guardian. The extensive comments are as good as the article.-http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science-Since I used to earn my living by doing proof-reading for scientific journals I have some familiarity with the academic publishing business. During the time I was working all the smaller companies were gradually eaten up by the big corporations, such as Elsevier.-Colquhoun is a campaigner against homeopathy, acupuncture and other alternative medical treatments that have no adequate evidential backing.
--
GPJ
Another slam at peer review
by David Turell , Tuesday, September 06, 2011, 02:41 (4805 days ago) @ George Jelliss
This article by David Colquhoun (and another by George Monbiot) have stirred up quite a storm about peer review and the academic journal business in The Guardian. The extensive comments are as good as the article. > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science-&#... so old there was no peer review when my 34 articles in the medical literature were published. I think the process is terrible. Group think. What must Kuhn think spinning in his grave? George, thanks for your contributions. they have been great.
Another slam at peer review
by David Turell , Wednesday, September 07, 2011, 18:14 (4803 days ago) @ George Jelliss
This article on climate science shows politization and group think. The countries who control the UN IPPC are third world and they want power and money, and use climate scares to opperate. Peer review is vicious here:-http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904537404576554750502443800.html?KEYWORDS=Anne+Jolis