Standard model; particle physics (Introduction)
by David Turell , Friday, November 12, 2010, 05:15 (5103 days ago)
The LHC is starting to track down the Higgs particle, one micro-step at a time, but at least we have a start.-http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44305
Standard model; particle physics
by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, November 14, 2010, 19:10 (5100 days ago) @ David Turell
The LHC is starting to track down the Higgs particle, one micro-step at a time, but at least we have a start. > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44305-What significance does this search have on your theology?
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Standard model; particle physics
by David Turell , Sunday, November 14, 2010, 21:51 (5100 days ago) @ xeno6696
The LHC is starting to track down the Higgs particle, one micro-step at a time, but at least we have a start. > > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44305 > > What significance does this search have on your theology?-None. The standard model underlies the universe God created. It is all very precise, orderly, and logical mathematically. Only an intellect could create such a magnificent system.
Standard model; particle physics
by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, November 14, 2010, 22:31 (5100 days ago) @ David Turell
The LHC is starting to track down the Higgs particle, one micro-step at a time, but at least we have a start. > > > > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44305 > > > > What significance does this search have on your theology? > > None. The standard model underlies the universe God created. It is all very precise, orderly, and logical mathematically. Only an intellect could create such a magnificent system.-I wish I could have that kind of faith in anything.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Standard model; new observartions and a contrary opinion
by David Turell , Friday, November 26, 2010, 03:44 (5089 days ago) @ David Turell
Penrose disputes the standard model. He sees circles in the cosmic wave background and denies inflation occurred:-http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44388-Wile other authors think they have pinned down dark energy through studies of galaxy movements and measurments:-http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44468
Standard model; new observartions and a contrary opinion
by David Turell , Friday, December 10, 2010, 00:59 (5075 days ago) @ David Turell
Penrose disputes the standard model. He sees circles in the cosmic wave background and denies inflation occurred: > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44388- A review of Penrose, casting many doubts about his conclusions, which propose one Big Bang after another:- http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/44458
Standard model; new observations and a contrary opinion
by David Turell , Saturday, December 25, 2010, 00:22 (5060 days ago) @ David Turell
Penrose disputes the standard model. He sees circles in the cosmic wave background and denies inflation occurred: > > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44388 > > > A review of Penrose, casting many doubts about his conclusions, which propose one Big Bang after another: > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/44458-Now there is a second paper finding by statistical analysis "circles' that MAY represent one universe running into another. Of course the article itself has a headline that already concludes what is not proven. Why these review lay articles always headline more than is proven, in my view, is an attempt at sensationalism and a liberal science agenda against religion. Can't have one big bang. Looks too much like a creation.-http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-12-scientists-evidence-universes.html
Standard model; new observations and a contrary opinion
by David Turell , Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 17:35 (4215 days ago) @ David Turell
Steinhardt always has contrary opinions. An old one uses membrane theory to propose the universe is two parallel membranes and when they bang together we get a fresh universe. Most disagree:-http://www.nature.com/news/higgs-data-could-spell-trouble-for-leading-big-bang-theory-1.12804
Standard model; particle physics
by David Turell , Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 05:20 (5085 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by unknown, Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 05:35
Scientific American has a new article touting (E8) as the new geometirc solution to a new unified theory. Maybe, but interesting.- http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-geometric-theory-of-everything#comme... then again another theory that separates out time from space, and seems to unify everything:-http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=104132
Standard model; particle physics
by David Turell , Friday, February 25, 2011, 04:27 (4998 days ago) @ David Turell
The LHC is not finding evidence of supersymmetry after three years of looking. But some are optimistic.-http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/45182
Standard model; particle physics
by David Turell , Sunday, February 27, 2011, 01:51 (4996 days ago) @ David Turell
The standard model of cosmology includes the cosmologic constant, which represents energy in space which contributes to the expansion of the universe. The following is an excellent discussion of this and trying to determine the shape of the universe:-http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110223/full/news.2011.105.html
Standard model; particle physics
by dhw, Friday, May 27, 2011, 14:41 (4906 days ago) @ David Turell
The following snippet from yesterday's Guardian might interest our scientists. The headline reads: "The electron is very, very round". A team of physicists made 25 million measurements, and this finding apparently rules out some particles that theories suggested might pop into existence at the Cern LHC. Jony Hudson, from Imperial College London, says: "What's interesting is that it is so round it is becoming difficult for theories like supersymmetry" ... which posits that every kind of particle has a heavy twin, but requires the electron be a slightly distorted shape. Well, theories come and theories go. Aaron Leanhardt (Univ. of Michigan) says the work gives a window on "the high energy soul of the cosmos." Interesting choice of words.
Standard model; LHC again confirms
by David Turell , Tuesday, July 23, 2013, 15:42 (4118 days ago) @ dhw
A rare finding fits the Standard model perfectly. Supersymmentry is supported. Dark matter is still hiding:-http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130719135959.htm
Standard model:new LHC particle confirms model
by David Turell , Thursday, July 06, 2017, 20:21 (2674 days ago) @ David Turell
Three quarks was expected:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2139899-lhc-pops-out-a-new-particle-that-could-tes...
" Researchers working on the LHCb experiment at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider have announced the discovery of the esoterically named Xicc++ particle. The find could help us probe our understanding of one of the four fundamental forces that govern the universe.
"The Xicc++ is a baryon, the family of particles that make up most ordinary matter and includes the likes of protons and neutrons. All baryons are made up of three quarks, a type of fundamental particle that comes in six different flavours. Theory suggests you can mix up these six in a variety of combinations to produce a whole host of baryons, but many of these combinations have yet to be observed in the real world.
"Obviously you want to discover all of the states so the picture is complete,” says LHCb member Abolhassan Jawahery at the University of Maryland. “It doesn’t represent new physics, but it does help fill the picture that we have of the quark model. It may resolve some outstanding puzzles.”
"This latest find is exciting particle physicists because it is the first confirmed to contain two heavier quarks known as charm quarks – the third constituent is an up quark.
"That means unlike in other baryons, where the three quarks rotate around each other equally, the two charm quarks are thought to sit at the centre of the Xicc++ with the lighter up quark orbiting around them.
"All this extra mass means Xicc++ weighs in at around 3621 megaelectronvolts, four times heavier than the proton. That’s in line with theorists’ expectations, says LHCb member Sheldon Stone at Syracuse University, New York, unlike previous results.
"In 2002, the SELEX experiment at US particle accelerator Fermilab found evidence for a similar particle, but with a different mass that puzzled theorists. “It had a very strange mass that looked suspicious,” says Stone. “It would have done chaos to our model of how things are put together. So this is going to be very comforting to the theorists.”
"The result announced today, at the European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics in Venice, Italy, has a statistical significance of over 7 sigma – a measure of how confident the researchers are in the find. Traditionally, physicists treat anything over 5 sigma as a firm discovery. The SELEX result only reached 4.8 sigma.
"Physicists hope studying the new particle will help them test quantum chromodynamics, the theory of the strong force, which is responsible for holding quarks together in baryons. As the Xicc++ is the first baryon to contain two heavy quarks, it will push the theory in a new direction. “It really tests the theory if you put two of them together with a light quark,” says Stone. “It’s a nice result.'”
Comment: the LHC is confirming the standard model of particles is accurate and valid. What is important is the LHC is upgraded, but it is not finding any new physics, just confirming what is known and expected. No sign of supersymmetry or other possible advances.
Standard model: proton weight may be smaller
by David Turell , Thursday, July 06, 2017, 20:36 (2674 days ago) @ David Turell
Protons are in all atoms. a lighter weight may explain why antimatter is so sparse:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2139372-protons-are-lighter-than-thought-which-may...
"The proton has lost a little of its bulk. A fresh attempt to pin down its mass, with three times the precision of the previous best try, finds that the subatomic particle is 30 billionths of a per cent lighter than we thought.
"All atoms contain at least one proton, which means measurements of its simplest characteristics – its size, charge and mass – can help answer some of the big questions in physics, including why the universe contains more matter than antimatter.
***
"The slimming down of the proton could help us fine-tune experiments that aim to understand why the amount of matter in the universe dwarfs the amount of antimatter, says Makoto Fujiwara, who works on CERN’s ALPHA experiment, seeking differences between hydrogen and its antimatter counterpart.
"More precise measurements on the proton will allow researchers to look for smaller discrepancies between it and the antiproton, although Fujiwara points out similar precision in antiproton measurements will be needed for that.
As for the tiny discrepancy between the new proton mass and the previously reported value, “in precision measurement, this is not so unusual”, Sturm says.
"But no one is yet sure why the results disagree. It could be an indication of new physics – or simply an experimental error that the researchers overlooked, Mohr says. “Of course, 99 percent of the time, it’s an experimental issue,” he says. “We don’t break through new principles that often.”
"Sturm’s group produced its measurement in time for CODATA’s latest physics standards, which will be published in a few months. Since we don’t know why this measurement differs from the last, CODATA has to carefully consider how to make use of the new value, Mohr says.
"Sturm’s group plans to repeat and refine the measurement. “We will try to implement some new techniques which should improve the precision by a factor of six,” he says."
Comment: the small amount of antimatter is not well explained.