The Case for Dualism (The nature of a \'Creator\')

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Saturday, October 23, 2010, 21:54 (5144 days ago) @ dhw

dhw,-Though what I reprinted directly is his foundational case, he goes on to state in the chapter that because consciousness implies an inverse--unconscious; the fundamental state of components is therefore dual in nature. There is mind, and there is matter. -I can already tell you that he hasn't read any Russel & Whitehead. Their Principia Mathematica ultimately solves this "mathematical" dilemma simply via their general proof that 1 + 1 really does equal 2. (I know, the mathematically minded must seem downright silly in seeking such a proof...)-But I will continue to wait a couple days. I certainly hope you aren't the only one willing to give this a go.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"