Questions of Light and Space (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 11:49 (5127 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

I've seen some of George's math and have no doubts as to his mathematical prowess. The point is, if physicist are able to determine that space is expanding in three dimensions with curved space time in between, as they claim, then they must have a way of accounting for the curvature of said space time. If they do not, then they can not say that space is expanding in three dimensions with curved space time in between. 
> 
> This is what strikes me as the fundamental flaw in the argument. Either they can account for it, and thus their assertions about expanding space are true, or they can not account for it and their assertions about expanding space are, while perhaps true, based on unprovable assumptions.-They account for it using math... I don't see where your argument is. The picture of the background that everyone has looked at is taken via the equivalent of an absolutely gigantic fishlens camera and turned into the image you'll see all over google images if you search for it. -It's accounted for.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"