Chapter 1 of \"Does it Matter?\": No such thing as AI (Humans)
I know Balance_Maintained would object by saying we would need to construct a biological brain, but I don't see that as necessary for several reasons. > -IF nano-technology were acting as the biochemical properties of the brain, it MIGHT be possible, but I remain skeptical. Whether it would have the same capability as the human brain, I almost completely disagree. There are a couple of tests that could sort of validate it. One would be the spontaeous generation of thought using unrelated without a pre-generated algorithm to determine the parameters. More simply stated, spontaneous without a human providing the input or the method to disassemble, reassemble, interpret, and create a new idea that has no current frame of reference other than the random data. Call it imagination. The other would be a test to see if the machine was capable of emotional response, which is in its way independent of logical data analysis.
Complete thread:
- Chapter 1 of \"Does it Matter?\": No such thing as AI -
xeno6696,
2010-09-15, 11:54
- Chapter 1 of \"Does it Matter?\": No such thing as AI -
Balance_Maintained,
2010-09-15, 15:05
- Chapter 1 of \"Does it Matter?\": No such thing as AI - xeno6696, 2010-09-16, 01:43
- Chapter 1 of \"Does it Matter?\": No such thing as AI -
Balance_Maintained,
2010-09-15, 15:05